Up front disclaimer -
I'll admit my preference/bias to Victorinox scissors.
Many people consider the Wenger SAK scissors "superior" to those on the Victorinox SAKs.
The most cited reason is the "flimsy" spring on the Victorinox.
But I have owned SAKs for well over 22 years and have yet to break or even weaken a Victorinox scissors spring.
Although I now know not to "abuse" the scissors, finally understanding that they are not wire-cutters or pliers
-
I have abused enough in my lifetime.....
Now I'd be the first to say - that spring can obviously break - otherwise there wouldn't be so many reports about it.
So Wenger responding to this "flaw" came up with the springless scissors - very cleverly utilizing the backspring to provide the springiness.
Wenger uses an "actuator" arm to utilize the backspring -
Here in lies the problem(s) for me.
When using the Wenger scissors - the whole scissors move relative to the knife handle.
This may seem trivial and something one can get used to -
I find it disconcerting -
especially when compared to no movement of the Victorinox.
The actuator arm of the Wenger takes up some thickness too - so that the actual scissors of the Wenger is made up of thinner material -
I don't have a micrometer to measure - but it seems pretty obvious to me that the Wenger scissors are much thinner than the Victorinox -
so which now would be considered flimsier?
Another point that some may have missed - in the upper photo - that's the full extent the Wenger scissors jaws will open - that's fine for any normal use of scissors.
But to possibly accomodate the changing of the spring the Victorinox scissors jaws will open up a lot more -
which probably can account for more abuse of the scissors - just from the sheer fact one can get a lot more material in the jaws to cut -
So in other words - the Victorinox scissor probably gets more "abuse" than the Wengers -
(a) because of the jaw opening - and
(b) probably becasue people "migrate" to the Wengers after having an abused Victorinox scissors fail - to what they think are superior Wenger scissors -
BUT they also have learnt not to abuse those scissors.
Look again at the spines of the scissors in the lower photo -
and now tell me which do you think might stand up to abuse better? -
not that I am advocating abuse.....
--
Vincent
http://UnknownVincent.cjb.net
http://UnknownVT.cjb.net
I'll admit my preference/bias to Victorinox scissors.
Many people consider the Wenger SAK scissors "superior" to those on the Victorinox SAKs.
The most cited reason is the "flimsy" spring on the Victorinox.
But I have owned SAKs for well over 22 years and have yet to break or even weaken a Victorinox scissors spring.
Although I now know not to "abuse" the scissors, finally understanding that they are not wire-cutters or pliers

I have abused enough in my lifetime.....
Now I'd be the first to say - that spring can obviously break - otherwise there wouldn't be so many reports about it.
So Wenger responding to this "flaw" came up with the springless scissors - very cleverly utilizing the backspring to provide the springiness.
Wenger uses an "actuator" arm to utilize the backspring -

Here in lies the problem(s) for me.
When using the Wenger scissors - the whole scissors move relative to the knife handle.
This may seem trivial and something one can get used to -
I find it disconcerting -
especially when compared to no movement of the Victorinox.
The actuator arm of the Wenger takes up some thickness too - so that the actual scissors of the Wenger is made up of thinner material -

I don't have a micrometer to measure - but it seems pretty obvious to me that the Wenger scissors are much thinner than the Victorinox -
so which now would be considered flimsier?
Another point that some may have missed - in the upper photo - that's the full extent the Wenger scissors jaws will open - that's fine for any normal use of scissors.
But to possibly accomodate the changing of the spring the Victorinox scissors jaws will open up a lot more -
which probably can account for more abuse of the scissors - just from the sheer fact one can get a lot more material in the jaws to cut -
So in other words - the Victorinox scissor probably gets more "abuse" than the Wengers -
(a) because of the jaw opening - and
(b) probably becasue people "migrate" to the Wengers after having an abused Victorinox scissors fail - to what they think are superior Wenger scissors -
BUT they also have learnt not to abuse those scissors.
Look again at the spines of the scissors in the lower photo -
and now tell me which do you think might stand up to abuse better? -
not that I am advocating abuse.....

--
Vincent
http://UnknownVincent.cjb.net
http://UnknownVT.cjb.net