- Joined
- Apr 1, 2004
- Messages
- 525
Why are there a good number of SAK's with both a large blade and a small blade, of the same basic style? Since the sizes of these blades are similar, I can't imagine a situation where that one can be used but not the other.
One can argue that two blades, whilst alternating cutting chores, stay sharper than one and therefore justify a desire for two blades. However, there's an extra weight cost incurred by having two blades, and besides, why not at least make the second blade serrated rather than plain just like the other, or perhaps make the edge straight for slicing, rather than tapered?
One can argue that two blades, whilst alternating cutting chores, stay sharper than one and therefore justify a desire for two blades. However, there's an extra weight cost incurred by having two blades, and besides, why not at least make the second blade serrated rather than plain just like the other, or perhaps make the edge straight for slicing, rather than tapered?