- Joined
- Jan 22, 2002
- Messages
- 73
I am comparing the Flash IIs against the Kershaw SpeedSafe designs. Given the complete lack of anything but Benchmade and CRKT at my local dealers, I must compare through information rather than hands on.
I did see a Kershaw Boa at a gun show lately, but for me it had two disadvantages: I absolutely hate linerlocks and coated blades. The former is a bit of a trust issue (no lock design debates please, plenty done in BF already), the latter a personal preference.
Thus the Alumnium Flash II has an advantage!
If whatever spring-thing that provides the movement in the SAT system breaks (I am sure it is unlikely
), will the knife still operate in a "manual" mode. In other words, if all hell breaks loose at the same time as the spring, will the knife still be useful? Some have stated that a failed torsion bar on a SpeedSafe may prevent the blade from properly staying closed.
Does the safety prevent the blade from moving, or does it only suppress the assisted opening feature?
Any other comments specific to SAT design superiority?
I did see a Kershaw Boa at a gun show lately, but for me it had two disadvantages: I absolutely hate linerlocks and coated blades. The former is a bit of a trust issue (no lock design debates please, plenty done in BF already), the latter a personal preference.
Thus the Alumnium Flash II has an advantage!
If whatever spring-thing that provides the movement in the SAT system breaks (I am sure it is unlikely

Does the safety prevent the blade from moving, or does it only suppress the assisted opening feature?
Any other comments specific to SAT design superiority?