- Joined
- May 8, 2011
- Messages
- 16
Hello to everyone,
As you can see I'm new to this forum. I'm from Finland. Originally my interest into knives derives from my passion for outdoor activities. Until these days, I have been using basic (cheap-ish) Finnish knives, puukkos. They have all been scandi grinds. I have a Marttiini, Roselli and a couple of Ahtis. The job I mostly need them for is all sort of food preparation and wood work, like firewood and making poles for a shelter.
I have bought some not-Finnish blades, like Spydercos, Kershaw, Kizlyar, CRKT, Gerber. I dont't know how you call these knives, but they sure are not scandi grinds. They are nice in some tasks to have around, especially I like the Kizlyar DV-2 and it's weight in heavier woodwork and the Spyderco's full-flat-ground blades in various cutting tasks. However I have noticed that in those tasks I need a knife most, the basic scandi grind puukko is worlds better than any of these other type of knives. Whether it be food preparing or making wood shavings to start a fire there is no match to a cheap puukko. Any work that includes handling wood a $10 puukko outperforms all of the knives I own, ranging from $10-$200.
So the question is, what is the philosophy of use of these not-scandi blades? What do you guys use them for and why do you find them to be top performers? Why are the edges ground the way they are? Does the difference between the knives come from the steel used, or is it the edge angle? All my Finnish puukkos are unspesified carbon steel, others are 8Cr13Mov, AUS8, different grade 440's, Kizlyar's Russian 65x13 etc.
I'm interested to hear about your points of view in this subject!
As you can see I'm new to this forum. I'm from Finland. Originally my interest into knives derives from my passion for outdoor activities. Until these days, I have been using basic (cheap-ish) Finnish knives, puukkos. They have all been scandi grinds. I have a Marttiini, Roselli and a couple of Ahtis. The job I mostly need them for is all sort of food preparation and wood work, like firewood and making poles for a shelter.
I have bought some not-Finnish blades, like Spydercos, Kershaw, Kizlyar, CRKT, Gerber. I dont't know how you call these knives, but they sure are not scandi grinds. They are nice in some tasks to have around, especially I like the Kizlyar DV-2 and it's weight in heavier woodwork and the Spyderco's full-flat-ground blades in various cutting tasks. However I have noticed that in those tasks I need a knife most, the basic scandi grind puukko is worlds better than any of these other type of knives. Whether it be food preparing or making wood shavings to start a fire there is no match to a cheap puukko. Any work that includes handling wood a $10 puukko outperforms all of the knives I own, ranging from $10-$200.
So the question is, what is the philosophy of use of these not-scandi blades? What do you guys use them for and why do you find them to be top performers? Why are the edges ground the way they are? Does the difference between the knives come from the steel used, or is it the edge angle? All my Finnish puukkos are unspesified carbon steel, others are 8Cr13Mov, AUS8, different grade 440's, Kizlyar's Russian 65x13 etc.
I'm interested to hear about your points of view in this subject!