Schrade Folding Dirk

Joined
Sep 9, 2007
Messages
1,909
Just out of curiosity, I bought a new Schrade floding dirk. It was $21 shipped new from SMKW.

I don't know if this is supposed to be a re-issue of an old pattern, or if it's a new fantasy model. Since dirks don't fold, I suspect the latter.

It comes in a nice display box.

dirk1.jpg


And it looks nice in there, too.

dirk2.jpg


When you take it out, the initial impression is good, but not if you look closely.

dirk3.jpg


dirk4.jpg


The bone is jigged, but it's very odd. It's done by machine, but clearly whoever designed the pattern doesn't know what jigging really looks like. The lock is front of the middle of the handle, and even though the blade swings freely when the lock is depressed, there is no play or movement when the knife is fully opened.

A pet peeve of mine is that the blade is far too short for the handle. Why is this so common, even on expensive knives? The soft, mystery stainless blade is 3.75" long, but could be 1/4" longer and still fit the handle. If the knife had been better thought out, the blade could have easily been another 1/4" longer still.

dirk5.jpg


This bizzarre knife has ornamented bolsters that remind one of grandma's silverware. They are decidedly out of place on this knife. Fit and finish are a mixed bag, the lock fits very nicely, but the rest of the finish is amateurish at best. But for 20 bucks, it's alright.

In any case, this knife is so much like a trainwreck, you don't want to look, but then you can't really lookaway, either.

dirk6.jpg
 
Last edited:
i'm going out on a limb here but i think its a cheapie chinese knife with a schrade logo.
cheers.Oh yeah and the word is "collectible".
 
Last edited:
New China Schrades just won't live up to name they bear.... Still interesting thing...
 
When SMKW first sold these they went from $20 to 50 depending on the handle material. They are now from $10 to 20, and at that price ( yes they are from China), they are an OK addition to a collection for "looks" and not for real use. The patterns are real from old 1700 to 1800 style knives. I get the feeling they would not hold up to any real use as a cutting tool.
 
Just out of curiosity, I bought a new Schrade floding dirk. It was $21 shipped new from SMKW.

I don't know if this is supposed to be a re-issue of an old pattern, or if it's a new fantasy model. Since dirks don't fold, I suspect the latter.

It comes in a nice display box.

And it looks nice in there, too.

When you take it out, the initial impression is good, but not if you look closely.

The bone is jigged, but it's very odd. It's done by machine, but clearly whoever designed the pattern doesn't know what jigging really looks like. The lock is front of the middle of the handle, and even though the blade swings freely when the lock is depressed, there is no play or movement when the knife is fully opened.

A pet peeve of mine is that the blade is far too short for the handle. Why is this so common, even on expensive knives? The soft, mystery stainless blade is 3.75" long, but could be 1/4" longer and still fit the handle. If the knife had been better thought out, the blade could have easily been another 1/4" longer still.

This bizzarre knife has ornamented bolsters that remind one of grandma's silverware. They are decidedly out of place on this knife. Fit and finish are a mixed bag, the lock fits very nicely, but the rest of the finish is amateurish at best. But for 20 bucks, it's alright.

In any case, this knife is so much like a trainwreck, you don't want to look, but then you can't really lookaway, either.

There are such things as folding dirks, and extremely ornamental fittings were common enough- look at Levine's fourth. It's not incorrect, just out of fashion.
 
Back
Top