Schrade Uncle Henry Pro Hunter 171UH

Joined
Sep 15, 2013
Messages
26
Just bought one from Wal Mart for under $26.00 I have a no. of Buck and Puma knives...I was interested in how this one compared. Out of the box it looked very nice. No manufacturing defects whatsoever. Was very sharp...just as much as a Buck or a Puma out of the box. Most bad reviews trash the Staglon handle. IMHO it is very good--solid & beefy with finger grooves. A very manly handle if you will. As I have real stag Puma's IMHO the Staglon looks quite good, but it is a matter of taste. The blade is very well finished with no flaws...it is very heavy duty, but some may prefer a longer one as it is 5.5" in length. For most cutting chores it is plenty good enough. The finger guard/pommel is of a brushed brass...looks quite elegant...a feature not found on Buck or Puma knives that use aluminum. . The blade is not a full tang and is similar to a Buck 119. Not a good knife for batoning. The blade is 4.4mm thick---a Puma Bowie is thinner (3.65mm) , the Buck 119 is a bit thicker at 4.65mm.

The Sheath is of a good quality leather, not quite as nice as on a Puma (which retails for $48.00) or a Buck, but perfectly useable. It is thicker than I had expected, but doesn't have rivets at stress points, however the stress points are double stitched. It has a snap closure that fits around the handle...very heavy duty. I did read a review that stated that the sheath was junk...I respectfully disagree.

IMHO this is a very useful knife that fits a broad range of uses. This is not a machete but would be a great skinning knife with its' 5.5" bowie style blade. An excellent general purpose knife similar to the popular Buck 119.

The blade is of 440A steel...only with use will I know how well it holds an edge. I would guess very well with an occasionally touch up to keep it sharp. Perhaps it has been heat treated to do better than one might expect. It is a very wide blade which means it has a long service life even if frequently sharpened. Take a Buck Woodsman with a fine blade that is very narrow, with frequent sharpening the blade's useful life is noticeably shortened. As it is of 420C...it will have to be touched up more often than a blade of 440C.

In summary and excellent value and knife that I feel most would be pleased with. For those that are handy in woodcraft the handle can be easily removed and you can replace with a homemade wooden one that you can custom fit to your specifications. As I have many high end knives, I like this one as I would not be afraid to use it in the field. I certainly would not want to beat up my Puma White Hunter or Bowie.
 
I have an old one that is made in USA with carbon steel. I find the handle a bit large for me. To me it almost feels like I want to chop something rather than cut something when I have it in my hand. My hands are just average sized but I am well over 6 feet tall.
 
My hands are average as well yet this large handled knife has a good feel to it IMHO. What fascinated me about it that is that despite its' large size, it is very comfortable..seems more controllable.
 
The old ones had very good sheaths as well. I do have a new one and the sheath is not near as high quality. I don't know what you would be using for batonning that the 171 wouldn't stand up to. I really don't think that mine would come apart.
 
I used a ceramic rod and then a strop on the Schrade Pro Hunter...using newspapers to test the sharpness...it was better than my Buck 119 or a Puma Bowie... Seems that the steel on it is honed easier. Time will tell how well it holds the edge. The Puma & Buck knives are of 440C steel..notorious for being difficult to hone to a fine edge.
 
Last edited:
Most bad reviews trash the Staglon handle.
The original USA Uncle Henry plasti-stag / staglon handles were made from Delrin, practically indestructible. I don't know if the new imports use Delrin still, or something else.

...IMHO the Staglon looks quite good, but it is a matter of taste.
IMO, the originals were more attractive on account of the dye job; seems the originals have more 'depth' to the coloring.
 
Seems to me that it is very tough...I've not heard of anyone with a broken handle. Schrade will replace it if it is not abused. I am not one to beat up my knives...should I want to do any knife abusing I use my cheap Brazilian Tramontina machetes.
 
Using an Hard Arkansas stone I sharpened the Schrade Pro Hunter (SPH) 25 times one each side...sliced through a sheet of newspaper like a straight razor. Did the same with a Buck 103 & a Puma Bowie. The first thing I noticed that they "skated" on the stone which means the blades are harder than the SPH...something that I expected. However they did not cut through a sheet of newspaper as well. With more stokes on the stone I am sure they eventually would, however it is interesting how they skated on the stone. Seems that the SPH sharpens faster & easier, but probably at the expense of it not holding an edge as well. To me the hardness of the blade is similar to a pocket knife. The SPH is of 44A stainless steel....the Puma and the Buck of 440C (the Buck is from the early 80's when Buck used 440C--they now use 420HC)....
 
Back
Top