I've been considering an SE Spyderhawk, mainly because I get a lot of use out of, and really love, my Tasman, and may want to try a bigger version. My main question is, are the serrations on the Spyderhawk cut to a similar depth as on the Tasman? If so, that would be great. Of the Salt knives I own with serrations, I've found that the Tasman's snag the least. The serrations are not cut as deeply as on, say, my SE Pacific, Atlantic and Salt 1 knives, which makes for easier cutting, IMO. I don't know if they're cut that way because of the hawkbill's inward curve of the edge.
Also, how thick is the tip on the Spyderhawk, by comparison? I have lost a tiny bit (almost unnoticeable) of the tip from my Tasman, which doesn't affect performance in any way. My Tasman's hawkbill tip is thinner, softer and more delicate that the one on my Harpy. I've used my Harpy's tip for abusive jobs I wouldn't subject my Tasman's tip to, but prefer to carry the Tasman.
I've also found that H-1 SE will sometimes roll into a wire edge if contacting something hard. Fortunately, it's simple enough to fix on my Sharpmaker. But so far it hasn't happened to my Tasman.
Thanx for any replies.
Jim
Also, how thick is the tip on the Spyderhawk, by comparison? I have lost a tiny bit (almost unnoticeable) of the tip from my Tasman, which doesn't affect performance in any way. My Tasman's hawkbill tip is thinner, softer and more delicate that the one on my Harpy. I've used my Harpy's tip for abusive jobs I wouldn't subject my Tasman's tip to, but prefer to carry the Tasman.
I've also found that H-1 SE will sometimes roll into a wire edge if contacting something hard. Fortunately, it's simple enough to fix on my Sharpmaker. But so far it hasn't happened to my Tasman.
Thanx for any replies.
Jim