Seal 2000 vs BT with spine serrations?

R

Reed

Joined
Oct 31, 2000
Messages
536
Just curious, but I noticed that on both the Striderknives.com and Striderblades.com note that the Seal 2000 has a blade length of 5.50" while the BT has a bladelength of 6.25". Maybe its just me, but I thought that the Seal 2000 and the BT with spine serrations where the same other than the stamp on the tang.

Anybodies thoughts?
Thanks,
Reed
 
I dont know about the SEAL 2000, but my MT-L has a blade of about 7 in. not the 6.50 that is described on the site. maybe some of the figures are a little off, or there are some mistakes at the site, or maybe they are just changing some dimensions of some models. either way the h*ll with the spellchecker as long as they keep making bad*ss blades. cant wait to break something with that SEAL 2001 Duane, and also cant wait for the looks I'm gonna get when it gets strapped on for callouts!
 
Yeah, your right about their blades.
Congrats on the SEAL 2001, I passed on one from Duane that was a good deal, and have been kicking myself ever since.
You probably won't get any looks at callout, but when you break that thing out to use it, some people might soil themselves, it is a nasty looking knife.
Take care,
Reed
 
Ahh... The SEAL 2001. A topic near and dear to my heart. I ordered mine in the beginning of July and the wait is killing me! *L*
 
Hey guys there might be some mistakes on striderblades.com I am not finished with the site yet. I promise it will be fixed soon. O yea spell checker what is that? My spell checker is sleeping right now once she wakes up she promised she will look over the site. They don't call me a jarhead for nothing..

Semper Fi
Mike
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top