Joe My decision on the Classic was purely due to the blade shape. I like a nice pointy tip on my utility knives. I dont do any prying with my knives, so a thinner tip is actually a plus in my book. I also dont do any skinning with my folders, so there really isnt a downside to a pointy tip in my case. I might as well get as much of the fine tip advantage that a smaller slipjoint often possesses, if Im spending the big bucks on a blade meant to be carried by itself. The only even minor problem that I can think of, specific to the Classic, is that the blade might be a little harder to sharpen while maintaining that nice sharp point. As an example, Ive always found drop points to be easier to sharpen than clip points, especially on a SharpMaker 204. But I hear that youre not so shabby with your sharpening, so its probably a moot point in your case.

Hehehehe
The handles on both the Classic and regular Sebenzas are quite similar, IMHO, so shape wasnt much of a concern to me. I dont find either to be all that ergonomic and comfortable, in contrast to something like Darrel Ralphs excellent EDC, but Ive held a lot worse. The Sebenza does provide a very secure grip though, which is what really matters when youre making a cut. You can get a vise-like grip on the Sebenza, with even less slippage than a knife as good as the BM710. Okay, I might have found the opening to be a little easier on the large Classic than the large regular, but that might just be due to the particular size and shape of my hand.
Im not terribly picky about thumb studs, disks and holes. I generally dont have a problem with any of them on larger folders. Smaller knives can be a bit tricky if not well designed, but the extra grip afforded by a larger handle makes things much easier. You also get used to opening a knife that youve been using it for a decently long time. You kind of get accustomed to the feel of the stud and the exact grip you need to open the knife. I dont think Ive used a halfway well-made folder that I couldnt get used to opening over time. I will admit though, that the Spyderco Military stands out in my collection, as the undisputed champion in ease of opening. That knifes ergonomics are incredible.
And the Sebenza is definitely a long term carry. You learn to subconsciously love it over time, where many great features just arent apparent at first glance and use. Chris Reeve managed to completely mask many good things about the Sebenza, where other knives have instantly recognizable traits. The knife is a bit of an oddity here. It works very well, but I cant seem to pin down exactly why is works so well for me, if that makes any sense whatsoever. When using the Seb, the focus is what youre cutting, not the knife itself. I know that probably makes no sense, but it seems to be true. The Sebenza is just a very reliable beater that you tend not to notice. You put in your pocket and take it out to use it. If you decide that you like it over time, you just take it for granted. Some people dont like that, especially knife nuts, which I totally understand. The knife doesnt strike you as being particularly impressive in any substantial number of ways. Theres nothing particularly flashy or exciting about it. It just becomes like a comfortable old shoe, which you hate to be without.
Oh yah. Mill slots in the handle? Youve been talking to Mayo now, havent you!!!

Thats actually a great idea. Why not make the knife as light as possible? If slots like the Camillus EDC could be machined into the handle
it might even further secure the grip, as well as allow the handle to be wrapped with paracord. Hmmmm