- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 3,516
What are the merits of having at least a partially serrated edge on your survival knife? Cutting cord is the first thing that jumps to mind, and that it does do. But as I would prefer not to even cut my paracord if I can at all help it, cord cutting would be at a bare minimum. Also cardboard is another victim to a good serrated edge, but not too common in the wild,
yet, many survival fixed blades seem to have this serrated section
For me, I would prefer a plain edge for my blade, mostly because serrated sections are often at the base of the blade, by the handle, which is where I find the most amount of control is, and for tasks such as fuzzsticks and deadfall triggers I much prefer a plain edge.
I did use to own a parachutist sak, which had a terrific upswept serrated blade perfectly suited for cord cutting, and would make short work of a seatbelt i'm certain, but I have since given it to a knifeless friend.
What are others opinions on the merits of serrated edges?
yet, many survival fixed blades seem to have this serrated section
For me, I would prefer a plain edge for my blade, mostly because serrated sections are often at the base of the blade, by the handle, which is where I find the most amount of control is, and for tasks such as fuzzsticks and deadfall triggers I much prefer a plain edge.
I did use to own a parachutist sak, which had a terrific upswept serrated blade perfectly suited for cord cutting, and would make short work of a seatbelt i'm certain, but I have since given it to a knifeless friend.
What are others opinions on the merits of serrated edges?