Share your opinion on micro bevels

Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
5,359
Just curious what others opinions are on mirco bevels. Personally I hate them because I feel they are a compromise on cutting performance and edge maintaince for increased durability and reduced intial sharpening time.

I'm open to hear other thoughts.

I do use them on softer steels when burr removal is a pain.

Or if a steel and geometry can't perform a given task without chipping and rolling.
 
I personally love them but I think they have to be done right... I don't normally use them on my folders simply because I regrind them all to very thin to begin with (.005-.010" at the shoulders).

The reasons I like them are:

1. They allow you to lower the secondary bevel angle a little lower than you could otherwise
2. They are super easy to touch up for a long time.
3. Helps get a nice clean burr free apex (as you stated)

To do this right though you will have to "dial it in" and play around w/ using your knives and some tests to see at what point the edge will roll or chip. Then add a microbevel and play around w/ the two angles until you have it just right. The problem is that most people put a 'micro' bevel on that is pretty large... ideally it should be all but invisible to the naked eye. They should not hinder cutting ability in any appreciable amount if done this way and in fact, will help it if you can get the secondary a little lower than you would normally.
 
I like them but it depends. Most has been said about Microbevels in the 9 page long sticky at the top of "Maintenance, Tinkering & Embellishment". Certainly worth a read, I have done it a few times.
 
There's a sticky on the top of the page that covers a lot of this.

When using a straight up stone, especially ceramic, they come in very handy. Also if I'm whipping up a coarse edge and not going through a progression. I don't much care for them as a default method because they often do not get rid of the burr anyway, I have to deburr prior to microbeveling for best result, and at that point no convenience benefit. They do come in handy as Josh mentions - on very thin primary ground edges it is very challenging to cleanly terminate the edge without one. My first hair whittling edge was done with a microbevel.

A hard backed strop does a very similar job for me, and is much faster, easier, and more reliably produces a clean apex. I have not noticed any difference in longevity of the edge when using a microbevel, though some claim this to be so. I've never heard of a blind test confirming this with multiple sharpeners contributing to a uniform process executed by multiple participants, so it could just come down to individual proficiency with certain techniques. Personally some of my longest lasting edges are done with no microbevel and no strop of any kind save plain paper to verify the lack of a burr. My personal experience is if the microbevel is too small to see, it likely is not helping edge durability to any appreciable degree if the supporting steel is too thin for the job at hand to begin with.

I do like the effect I get from steeling an edge on lower RC steels, and this is certainly a form of microbevel but not commonly included as such.

In any event folks should try them out and try without - see what works for the individual.
 
Good insights folks. I'm just curious what the census is about them no right or wrong. Just learning from others opinions.
 
I've not bothered with them (deliberately, anyway) on softer steels at all, as such blades will still exhibit the same burring tendencies no matter what's done to the edge geometry. Trying to clean up burrs on an even smaller or tiny bevel is just a lot more work than it would otherwise take to clean up the burrs on the primary in the first place. On very soft stainless that's prone to tenacious burring, I've yet to find any blade that won't clean up quickly on a hard-backed denim strop with some white rouge or similarly aggressive-but-still-fine compound. That's how I often deal with those. The wider bevels that come with a more acute primary are inherently more self-stabilizing on the strop & stone than a very, very narrow microbevel would be; refining such an edge is inherently easier without the worries of trying to 'feel' for flush contact on a very narrow bevel.

Very softish steels can at least benefit from narrower primary geometry behind the apex, which will help the blade keep working to some extent after the crisp apex goes away. With soft steels, blunting of the apex still happens just as quickly at wider edge angles; but the thicker geometry will stop cutting altogether with a blunt apex. That's the other reason I don't bother with microbevels on softish blades; it just doesn't make much of a difference in cutting durability anyway. I'd much rather produce a thinner edge that cuts much better in the first place, and just touch it up as needed.

On harder steels, I've sometimes applied a quick micro using such devices as a Sharpmaker, just to put some quick bite back into an edge with a primary that's narrower than the sharpener's set angle. Again, I don't really do this with the deliberate intent of adding a microbevel itself, but instead just to get a moderately dull edge cutting again quickly, of which the result is effectively a microbevel. Normally no issues or complaints in doing it that way, with those blades.


David
 
Last edited:
I'd like to add that I do use a microbevel on a scandi grind at times when outdoors. A few single edge leading strokes alternating. However it takes some time to clean that up even at home with all the equipment.
 
I remember I was sharpening a railroad spike knife for a friend.
Softest steel I've ever sharpened.

I could see and move the burr with my finger.

I pulled the edge through a piece of soft wood and a wirey piece of steel striped off the edge.

Talk about satisfing.
However, the burr I couldn't see was there,

Mocking me.

Removing the burr was impossible I'd strop forever on leather, paper, deniem, compounds. Nothing.

Finally I just cut it off with a micro bevel on my finest stone.

Was able to cut paper and shave hair with effort.

Mirco bevel saved that day.
 
I don't care much for the word itself. If used to describe a blade run across a strop at what the sharpener believes is an elevated position relative to the sharpening angle, then the blades just being stopped, no micro taking place.
If the sharpener is using a controlled angle when sharpening, a WE or other controlling system and then the angle is changed, the result being a less acute apex, then that is a micro bevel. These are two different techniques.
I confess when I sharpen a knife blade I always use a controlled system, whether on a stone or a belt machine and when finishing the edge the angle is changed by a minute amount, one degree, the idea being to address the final condition of the apex by contacting the apex alone; this makes the apex "smoother". The belief that changing the sharpening angle by 1 or 2 degrees effects the cutting ability because of the change in geometry is not realistic.

I believe the discussion itself should improve a persons sharpening ability. Once you realize the effect of changing the sharpening angle by small amounts it helps the sharpener to understand the process.

For those who sharpen free hand the small changes in angle are taking place as the sharpening is taking place and there is little need for a "micro bevel"

Regards, Fred
 
Personally some of my longest lasting edges are done with no microbevel and no strop of any kind save plain paper to verify the lack of a burr.

Not to derail the thread, but do you find that paper w/ compound on some type of board or something flat does not round the apex? I am wanting to try this. Denim on a hardbacked surface still rounds the teeth off from what I have tried. Also, when you use the paper do you elevate the angle as Fred was stating to make sure the burr is gone?

Some of our differences/preferences may also be due to our experiences w/ 2 different systems... I use a guided jig (WEPS) because I am not skilled enough to do it freehand like you :D:thumbup:
 
Not to derail the thread, but do you find that paper w/ compound on some type of board or something flat does not round the apex? I am wanting to try this. Denim on a hardbacked surface still rounds the teeth off from what I have tried. Also, when you use the paper do you elevate the angle as Fred was stating to make sure the burr is gone?

Some of our differences/preferences may also be due to our experiences w/ 2 different systems... I use a guided jig (WEPS) because I am not skilled enough to do it freehand like you :D:thumbup:


Had to take a minute to write this up, hope it is comprehensible.
What I have found -
compound directly on hardwood tends not to round at all except for user error, but also makes it very difficult to cleanly work the apex. Often there will be a burr left, just like using a trailing pass on a hard fixed abrasive surface. Open cell wood like red oak works better than clear maple - this is actually a method used in many regions of N Europe and elsewhere to sharpen tools, on a knife board with loose grit. The effect is not as crisp as off a stone, but can still be pretty good.

compound on softer wood like balsa or poplar will allow the minerals to sink into the wood a bit more and still have some mobility - burr formation is reduced or reversed - burr is gone. Depending on abrasives used, edge will be considerably more polished and uniform at the apex. Feedback is not good, stock removal rates not very high compared to a stone, some rounding will become apparent with repeated or prolonger use. As long as you don't press so hard it deflects into the wood (which might not take that much force at all...) , or errantly elevate the spine too high, the rounding will be spread over the entire bevel surface and not localized at the apex.

Paper over a smooth stone allows the edge bevel to sink into the stock somewhat. The paper has formation to it, and will deflect and expand at pressure levels at or below what is needed to get a good polish. So yes, still some rounding at the apex. This tendency is also present in sandpapers and to lesser extent but still detectable, in lapping films. Is pressure dependent, so with a real light touch, few passes, working at a lower angle than the original grind, rounding of any sort will be slight and spread over the entire bevel. Thinner papers will display less rounding, all other things being equal, and can fall into the range of poplar or balsa.

If you wrap the paper around the coarse side of a vitreous stone, the high points on the stone press into the paper and the formation collapses (little or no re-expansion after pressure is removed) with less applied force - the safe pressure operating range increases as the paper density goes up. The open areas around the high points allow the paper to deflect away from the edge with less pressure, they do not push back as hard as they return to their original volume/location. There is less overall rounding of the apex and the bevel itself. And as with all methods that reduce the abrasive footprint, stock removal rates go up as well until the footprint gets so small it looses effectiveness. Taken to something of an extreme is my Washboard and its almost bladelike teeth pushing into the paper in a uniform, open pattern. It was directly influenced by the observation of paper over a coarse stone, among others. As with working off a board, most of the rounding is operator error, not an inherent issue with the materials. Again, thinner papers will display less rounding, all other things being equal.

Plain paper over a hard surface will not round at all that I can detect under magnification, even with a number of passes. The abrasives are not hard enough, or a large enough percentage of the surface area but along with the paper fibers themselves, are capable of lining up the edge, removing very small burrs, and if the spine is elevated, some slight burnishing of low carbide steels will occur. This is how I finish most sharpening, and all sharpening when finishing right off a stone, as much to apply a slight burnish as to make certain all burrs are gone. Plain paper burnishing is the safest way to finish an edge if no rounding is acceptable.

If compound is involved I do not elevate the spine at all - whatever slight deflection occurs is enough of an apex clean up for me. I can detect the original grind angle, I cannot accurately gauge the shift if I start elevating the spine in the absence of specific feedback, and the angle will open up to unacceptable levels almost immediately.

Much of the above has to do with repetition and pressure tolerance. A small number of very light passes on denim over a hard surface is unlikely to cause issues. Is when the spine is elevated, pressure levels high enough to compress the fabric are used that real rounding occurs. Any material with give is going to have this tendency - a range of safe pressure, a range where it begins to sag, a region where it re-expands to fill its previous volume as pressure is removed, rounding the bevel and possibly the edge. Putting abrasives on these materials allows the minerals to move around a bit, reducing/reversing burr formation and presenting a more uniform abrasive field. Managing the ill effects involves understanding the limitations of the specific materials.
 
Not to derail the thread, but do you find that paper w/ compound on some type of board or something flat does not round the apex? I am wanting to try this. Denim on a hardbacked surface still rounds the teeth off from what I have tried. Also, when you use the paper do you elevate the angle as Fred was stating to make sure the burr is gone?

Some of our differences/preferences may also be due to our experiences w/ 2 different systems... I use a guided jig (WEPS) because I am not skilled enough to do it freehand like you :D:thumbup:

On that specific point, lighter pressure and/or a more conservative angle (lower) should help. How the denim is affixed to the backing also makes a difference in how it will (or won't) lift/roll under some pressure from the knife's edge, therefore affecting what happens at the apex. I have three such strops: one is a Home Depot 21" paint-stirring stick (for 5-gal. buckets) with the denim affixed using some double-sided tape (not the foam type), used with the Sears #2 compound (this one works beautifully, and it's also the cheapest); the other two have been affixed to 1/4" poplar and 3/4" red oak with contact cement, utilizing Ryobi white rouge on the poplar strop and Mother's Mag on the red oak strop. With the stick compounds I've used (Ryobi white rouge and Sears' #2 grey), they will also tend to pack down/stiffen the denim substrate with heavier loading of compound over time; no reason to be shy about loading it up. That makes it both less prone to rolling around the apex, and the dense application of compound also makes the strop very aggressive at burr removal with still-very-light pressure (just a light 'skimming' pass, as if brushing it on your pants leg to 'clean' debris off the blade). Oftentimes, only 1-3 light passes per side will strip burrs away very easily, while still leaving the 'tooth' intact on the edge.


David
 
Last edited:
Had to take a minute to write this up, hope it is comprehensible.
What I have found -
compound directly on hardwood tends not to round at all except for user error, but also makes it very difficult to cleanly work the apex. Often there will be a burr left, just like using a trailing pass on a hard fixed abrasive surface. Open cell wood like red oak works better than clear maple - this is actually a method used in many regions of N Europe and elsewhere to sharpen tools, on a knife board with loose grit. The effect is not as crisp as off a stone, but can still be pretty good.

compound on softer wood like balsa or poplar will allow the minerals to sink into the wood a bit more and still have some mobility - burr formation is reduced or reversed - burr is gone. Depending on abrasives used, edge will be considerably more polished and uniform at the apex. Feedback is not good, stock removal rates not very high compared to a stone, some rounding will become apparent with repeated or prolonger use. As long as you don't press so hard it deflects into the wood (which might not take that much force at all...) , or errantly elevate the spine too high, the rounding will be spread over the entire bevel surface and not localized at the apex.

Paper over a smooth stone allows the edge bevel to sink into the stock somewhat. The paper has formation to it, and will deflect and expand at pressure levels at or below what is needed to get a good polish. So yes, still some rounding at the apex. This tendency is also present in sandpapers and to lesser extent but still detectable, in lapping films. Is pressure dependent, so with a real light touch, few passes, working at a lower angle than the original grind, rounding of any sort will be slight and spread over the entire bevel. Thinner papers will display less rounding, all other things being equal, and can fall into the range of poplar or balsa.

If you wrap the paper around the coarse side of a vitreous stone, the high points on the stone press into the paper and the formation collapses (little or no re-expansion after pressure is removed) with less applied force - the safe pressure operating range increases as the paper density goes up. The open areas around the high points allow the paper to deflect away from the edge with less pressure, they do not push back as hard as they return to their original volume/location. There is less overall rounding of the apex and the bevel itself. And as with all methods that reduce the abrasive footprint, stock removal rates go up as well until the footprint gets so small it looses effectiveness. Taken to something of an extreme is my Washboard and its almost bladelike teeth pushing into the paper in a uniform, open pattern. It was directly influenced by the observation of paper over a coarse stone, among others. As with working off a board, most of the rounding is operator error, not an inherent issue with the materials. Again, thinner papers will display less rounding, all other things being equal.

Plain paper over a hard surface will not round at all that I can detect under magnification, even with a number of passes. The abrasives are not hard enough, or a large enough percentage of the surface area but along with the paper fibers themselves, are capable of lining up the edge, removing very small burrs, and if the spine is elevated, some slight burnishing of low carbide steels will occur. This is how I finish most sharpening, and all sharpening when finishing right off a stone, as much to apply a slight burnish as to make certain all burrs are gone. Plain paper burnishing is the safest way to finish an edge if no rounding is acceptable.

If compound is involved I do not elevate the spine at all - whatever slight deflection occurs is enough of an apex clean up for me. I can detect the original grind angle, I cannot accurately gauge the shift if I start elevating the spine in the absence of specific feedback, and the angle will open up to unacceptable levels almost immediately.

Much of the above has to do with repetition and pressure tolerance. A small number of very light passes on denim over a hard surface is unlikely to cause issues. Is when the spine is elevated, pressure levels high enough to compress the fabric are used that real rounding occurs. Any material with give is going to have this tendency - a range of safe pressure, a range where it begins to sag, a region where it re-expands to fill its previous volume as pressure is removed, rounding the bevel and possibly the edge. Putting abrasives on these materials allows the minerals to move around a bit, reducing/reversing burr formation and presenting a more uniform abrasive field. Managing the ill effects involves understanding the limitations of the specific materials.

On that specific point, lighter pressure and/or a more conservative angle (lower) should help. How the denim is affixed to the backing also makes a difference in how it will (or won't) lift/roll under some pressure from the knife's edge, therefore affecting what happens at the apex. I have three such strops: one is a Home Depot 21" paint-stirring stick (for 5-gal. buckets) with the denim affixed using some double-sided tape (not the foam type), used with the Sears #2 compound (this one works beautifully, and it's also the cheapest); the other two have been affixed to 1/4" poplar and 3/4" red oak with contact cement, utilizing Ryobi white rouge on the poplar strop and Mother's Mag on the red oak strop. With the stick compounds I've used (Ryobi white rouge and Sears' #2 grey), they will also tend to pack down/stiffen the denim substrate with heavier loading of compound over time; no reason to be shy about loading it up. That makes it both less prone to rolling around the apex, and the dense application of compound also makes the strop very aggressive at burr removal with still-very-light pressure (just a light 'skimming' pass, as if brushing it on your pants leg to 'clean' debris off the blade). Oftentimes, only 1-3 light passes per side will strip burrs away very easily, while still leaving the 'tooth' intact on the edge.


David

Thanks guys good points. I will definitely have to try the plain paper w/ no compound on a hard surface (most likely a stone) and see what results I get.

On the denim I simply taped both ends to a flat piece of plastic so the denim will push up in front of the edge while you strop it. But normally I only do 1-2 passes per side w/ it if I do any at all.
 
On the denim I simply taped both ends to a flat piece of plastic so the denim will push up in front of the edge while you strop it. But normally I only do 1-2 passes per side w/ it if I do any at all.

Josh, even if I used spray glue on wood for the one layer of denim I got a tiny bit of a "rolling" effect. Since I use contact cement, no more problems. Any stick compound is easy to apply to denim compared to other surfaces as leather or balsa. Also, paper on Martin's washboard accepts stick compound very nicely and one of my best convex edges I got from 2 sheets of paper on washboard with compound.
 
Back
Top