- Joined
- Nov 14, 1998
- Messages
- 213
Greetings,
This is a theory.
For years, knife manufacturers have been touting the cutting and slicing efficiency of their products, flagrantly using such bold statements like "honed" or the ever-suspicious, "sharp".
My question then to you is this. Why is it that we need "sharp" knives? And by whose definition of "sharp"? Personally, I think the flint shards I chip off in the backyard work well enough.
And obviously, there is a larger issue here, namely one of safety. Can we as consumers be allowed to own such potentially dangerous tools? How can the manufacturers sleep at night, knowing little Timmy could find his father's M.D.U.K. in the house?
I, for one, believe these terms like "sharp", or "razor-honed" are examples of irresponsible pandering to the knife using public. If one or even two people are goaded into purchasing one of these so called "razor-honed" knives because of the salacious advertising campaigns, doesn't it send a message to us all? Surely, we will soon become a population of Band-Aid wearing, Twinkie eating automatons, salivating in a Pavlovian like trance, whilst we await the newest "ultra-sharp" M.D.U.K. from XYZ Co.
Are we being led to believe "sharp" knives actually work better for some reason? If this is the case, then I would like to see some scientific proof. (Perhaps the JPL labs in Boston could free up some time) Is there truth to this "edge geometry" talk I've been hearing so much about? Or is this all a part of a grand ruse masterfully orchestrated by the cutlery manufacturers?
Thoughts? Opinions?
Thank You,
clip
(toungue planted FIRMLY in cheek)
This is a theory.
For years, knife manufacturers have been touting the cutting and slicing efficiency of their products, flagrantly using such bold statements like "honed" or the ever-suspicious, "sharp".
My question then to you is this. Why is it that we need "sharp" knives? And by whose definition of "sharp"? Personally, I think the flint shards I chip off in the backyard work well enough.
And obviously, there is a larger issue here, namely one of safety. Can we as consumers be allowed to own such potentially dangerous tools? How can the manufacturers sleep at night, knowing little Timmy could find his father's M.D.U.K. in the house?
I, for one, believe these terms like "sharp", or "razor-honed" are examples of irresponsible pandering to the knife using public. If one or even two people are goaded into purchasing one of these so called "razor-honed" knives because of the salacious advertising campaigns, doesn't it send a message to us all? Surely, we will soon become a population of Band-Aid wearing, Twinkie eating automatons, salivating in a Pavlovian like trance, whilst we await the newest "ultra-sharp" M.D.U.K. from XYZ Co.
Are we being led to believe "sharp" knives actually work better for some reason? If this is the case, then I would like to see some scientific proof. (Perhaps the JPL labs in Boston could free up some time) Is there truth to this "edge geometry" talk I've been hearing so much about? Or is this all a part of a grand ruse masterfully orchestrated by the cutlery manufacturers?
Thoughts? Opinions?
Thank You,
clip
(toungue planted FIRMLY in cheek)