I've been using a professional model Edge Pro for a few years now...very happy with the sharpener itself and the results. Lots of friends are too.
For some time, I have been examining various edges under 30-50x magnification, sometimes >100x when I have access to my friend's microscope. I have also used other sharpeners, steels, diamonds, etc. After experimenting a fair amount, this is my quandry:
Under high magnification, many hair-popping-sharp edges (even brand new blades just received from the makers) look like plowed fields, with countless parallel scratches in the steel, resulting in an undulating, saw-like edge. It looks like what you might call micro serrations. The angles for the blades are from 18 to 22 degrees. These edges will frequently pop the hairs right off with no problem.
On the other hand, I have worked on edges with stones progressing from 220 grit to 1200 grit, then waterstones at 4000 or even 8000, then stropped with 10,000 grit chromium oxide, until they have a mirror-like polished surface and a very smooth, straight edge (under 50x mag). These edges are also at 18 to 22 degrees.
The rougher edges are fairly easy and quick to produce and, if shaving is an effective measurement, they are also sharp. Other tests, like grabbing the fingernail, also seem to indicate a sharp blade.
However, the highly-polished, straight edges take some time and don't seem to shave or grab the fingernail quite as well. These mirror edges last well and are easy to touch up, but don't seem to possess the raw cutting power that the rougher edges have.
Have the expert sharpeners in the forum noticed this too or am I missing something? Is it just a waste of time to work for the mirror-polished, precise edge? It seems that the quicker, easier job would meet most folk's demands just fine, but those mirror edges sure look nice.
Any thoughts?
Mike
For some time, I have been examining various edges under 30-50x magnification, sometimes >100x when I have access to my friend's microscope. I have also used other sharpeners, steels, diamonds, etc. After experimenting a fair amount, this is my quandry:
Under high magnification, many hair-popping-sharp edges (even brand new blades just received from the makers) look like plowed fields, with countless parallel scratches in the steel, resulting in an undulating, saw-like edge. It looks like what you might call micro serrations. The angles for the blades are from 18 to 22 degrees. These edges will frequently pop the hairs right off with no problem.
On the other hand, I have worked on edges with stones progressing from 220 grit to 1200 grit, then waterstones at 4000 or even 8000, then stropped with 10,000 grit chromium oxide, until they have a mirror-like polished surface and a very smooth, straight edge (under 50x mag). These edges are also at 18 to 22 degrees.
The rougher edges are fairly easy and quick to produce and, if shaving is an effective measurement, they are also sharp. Other tests, like grabbing the fingernail, also seem to indicate a sharp blade.
However, the highly-polished, straight edges take some time and don't seem to shave or grab the fingernail quite as well. These mirror edges last well and are easy to touch up, but don't seem to possess the raw cutting power that the rougher edges have.
Have the expert sharpeners in the forum noticed this too or am I missing something? Is it just a waste of time to work for the mirror-polished, precise edge? It seems that the quicker, easier job would meet most folk's demands just fine, but those mirror edges sure look nice.
Any thoughts?
Mike