Sharpening Meter

Joined
Apr 16, 2024
Messages
10
We present to you an absolute exclusive: the SHARP-METR sharpness meter.

We have long been interested in the question: How to quantitatively measure the sharpness of a sharpening? Quantitatively, not just qualitatively, with tests on paper, hair or tissue, because the aforementioned tests, like many other such tests, are very subjective and depend on many specific conditions. The goal was to get a quantitative assessment of sharpness.

What resulted, you can see in the video below.

First we had to choose a working body for the measurements. It seemed most likely to us to take as a basis a fishing line (monofilament) with a diameter of 0.2-0.3 mm. This diameter was chosen empirically, based on testing different diameters. This choice allowed us to obtain reliable readings over a wide range of measurements. For example, the new OLFA EXTRA SHARP blade gives 230 g. A similar blade, but not EXTRA SHARP, but a conventional stainless blade, gives 350 g. The difference is significant. The difference in readings is more than significant, considering the maximum resolution of 1 g (0.01n). Cutting the fishing line is done with a semi-automatic turret, by smoothly lowering the blade. The time is about 5-8 seconds. You must place the blade in the holder, then smoothly lower the blade onto the fishing line until the cut occurs. The peak reading remains on the display until the next reset to zero. One of the most important conditions for stable readings is to use the dynamometer not only to determine the cutting force, but also to set the thread tension. It is the thread tension that determines the cutting force reading. In this case, a thread tension of 200g (2n) has been selected. The stronger the thread tension, the less cutting force required and the lower the absolute reading. In addition, the monofilament tends to stretch, its tensile force is about 10 kg. The so-called “braid” - a thread woven from many fibers - is much smaller in this respect (almost zero elongation coefficient), but it has a specific property when cutting - there is no clear breaking moment.

When creating the device we tried to observe several conditions: ease of use, work without additional tools. All manipulations with the measures are very simple, the thread itself is on a special dispenser for threads, the stock of thread on the spool for about 500 measures (about 50 meters). The thread can be bought in any fishing store. Through a special window in the dispenser you can always see the amount of thread on the spool. The spool of the dispenser is equipped with a friction brake, which prevents the thread from tangling, so the thread is pulled out with little effort. The thread holding knots are made to make it easier to wind and hold the thread. There are even pins to keep the clamps from turning on their own. The dynamometer itself has a “PEAK” mode that records the peak cutting force. The reading is stored on the display until the next reset. The dynamometer is powered by 2 AAA batteries. The batteries can be replaced without removing the dynamometer from the base.

This design utilizes dynamometers from different manufacturers, but are exactly the same in functionality, size, and even price. The only matter of choice is stock availability and delivery time. There are no differences other than appearance, they even come in identical cases.
 
Firstly, excellent concept and great idea but please note below some important changes you need to consider.

I have experimented extensively with your Sharp Meter and found a significant flaw when using 200g as a pre-tension force. For accurate reading, a much lower pre-tension force of around 20g works far better due to how these peak force meters measure.

While watching your video above, I can see that the same mistake is being made with 200g pre-tension force and your testing does not seem to have discovered this problem.

Let me explain -

Firstly, you need to understand that these force meters measure peak in BOTH directions (both for push and pull). This means that if you measure a sharp blade and the cutting force equates to less than 200g, your peak force is measured in the opposite direction when the line is sliced, resulting in around approximately 200g measurement for any and all blades sharper than 200g cutting force. This happens because of the line snapping and the force meter measuring "backwards" in the opposite direction, effectively reading the line pre-tension force relaxing in the opposite direction after it has been zeroed at 200g.

I see the same mistake being made in your video above. At time 1:27 your measurement is correct at 0.9n (90g cutting force), then the line snaps and your force meter jumps back to 2.29n (229g) (you can see the peak force arrow reverse on the screen). This final peak measurement is completely incorrect because it measured the line pretension force relaxing after it was cut. Look at the force direction arrow at 1:27 and then the final peak saved force direction arrow reversed at 1:29. You'll see the problem I'm referring to.

If you use a pretension force of around 0.2n / 20g, you can accurately measure any sharp blade down to a minimum of 20g. If a blade would be sharper than 20g cutting force, the same problem will occur but it is far less likely to have a blade this sharp in most cases. Around 30g cutting force is fairly normal for a Feather DE razor blade, which is used as a bit of a "gold standard" for very sharp reference. This is why a pretension of approximately 20g /0.2n has to be used.

Using a pre-tension force of 2n/200g only yields accurate results if the knife is quite blunt and cuts at a force of more than 200g.

Your concept is great, but your process of measurement needs to be changed due to how the force meter measures.

I hope this explanation makes sense to you?

Secondly, I also found that the plastic backing plate being used causes erroneous zeroing when you press the peak zero reference button on the meter. The mere force of pushing the button to zero the reference, affects the tension on the line to change due to the backing plate slightly bending. A more rigid backing plate should be used.

Hope all of this information helps.
 
Last edited:
Firstly, excellent concept and great idea but please note below some important changes you need to consider.

I have experimented extensively with your Sharp Meter and found a significant flaw when using 200g as a pre-tension force. For accurate reading, a much lower pre-tension force of around 20g works far better due to how these peak force meters measure.

While watching your video above, I can see that the same mistake is being made with 200g pre-tension force and your testing does not seem to have discovered this problem.

Let me explain -

Firstly, you need to understand that these force meters measure peak in BOTH directions (both for push and pull). This means that if you measure for a sharp blade and the cutting force equates to less than 200g, your peak force is measured in the opposite direction when the line is sliced, resulting in around approximately 200g measurement for any and all blades sharper than 200g cutting force. This happens because of the line snapping and the force meter measuring "backwards" in the opposite direction, effectively reading the line pre-tension force relaxing in the opposite direction after it has been zeroed at 200g.

I see the same mistake being made in your video above. At time 1:27 your measurement is correct at 0.9n (90g cutting force), then the line snaps and your force meter jumps back to 2.29n (229g) (you can see the peak force arrow reverse on the screen). This final peak measurement is completely incorrect because it measured the line pretension force relaxing after it was cut. Look at the force direction arrow at 1:27 and then the final peak saved force direction arrow reversed at 1:29. You'll see the problem I'm referring to.

If you use a pretension force of around 0.2n / 20g, you can accurately measure any sharp blade up to a minimum of 20g. If a blade would be sharper than 20g cutting force, the same problem will occur but it is far less likely to have a blade this sharp in most cases. Around 30g cutting force is fairly normal for a Feather DE razor blade, which is used as a bit of a "gold standard" for very sharp reference. This is why a pretension of approximately 20g /0.2n has to be used.

Using a pre-tension force of 2n/200g only yields accurate results if the knife is quite blunt and cuts at a force of more than 200g.

Your concept is great, but your process of measurement needs to be changed due to how the force meter measures.

I hope this explanation makes sense to you?

Secondly, I also found that the plastic backing plate being used causes erroneous zeroing when you press the peak zero reference button on the meter. The mere force of pushing the button to zero the reference, affects the tension on the line to change due to the backing plate slightly bending. A more rigid backing plate should be used.

Hope all of this information helps.
Thank you very much for your comments about our product. Indeed, the measurement readings are more stable at a 0.2n/20g deski voltage. We will make changes to the instructions. As for the stand, much depends on the surface on which measurements are taken. It is preferable to take measurements on a flat surface. An existing measuring instrument can be improved by mounting our column on it. To do this, simply drill 3 holes according to the template and screw on the column. If you wish, we can send it to you free of charge. You will only have to pay the postage.
 
Back
Top