JoHnYKwSt, if that's the case, then we can never really get serrations back to a factory edge (which, on a Spydie is formidable), since we're basically building a shoulder at the edge grind.
Personally, I've sharpened several of my Spydies using the 204, and while they've always been sharp enough, they never quite cut like out of the box.
The extreme example was a Merlin that I bought and used to cut some heavy stalks of vegetation. Was a great tool for that, but after an hour or so, the fully serrated edge was nothing more than a saw...the individual serrations were dulled far beyond being able to push thru paper as when new.
Several sessions with the 204 brought the serrations back to sharp, but not with the smoothness in paper cutting as when new ... and the performance varied depending on the part of the serration used, probably because no matter how slowly you draw the blade across the stones, the tips of the teeth will prevent an even distribution of force/motion of the stone on the curved edge of the individual serrations.
I've accepted this as a limitation of the serrated edge, and even question whether I need it as sharp as new (cuts goods, but dulls fast). I prefer a plain edge cuz it's gratifying sometimes to occasionally make an edge for "wow" show purposes.
With respect to the original question (tho I know it's directed to Sal), I think the serrations as easier to sharpen than plain-edge with two caveats:
1) A dull serrated edge cuts better than a dull plain-edge, so doing nothing (or minimal sharpening) still leaves you with a better performing, or at least workable edge, for most purposes.
2) You can almost never get a dulled (and I mean DULL) serrated edge back to factory sharp ... you just can't work the serrations evenly. Honing each serration freehand with a stone may be the best bet, but tedious and perhaps uneven. Anyone who feels otherwise should match their dulled/re-sharpened serrated edge against the same knife out of the box. Does every part of any serration cut as well as new?
Of course, I'm always ready (and in this case, more than happy) to be proven wrong
[This message has been edited by Longden (edited 21 October 1999).]