- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 16,703
A few weeks ago, one of Jerry's classic knives flew into town for a brief visit:
Here he is with a young friend, the SAR4 (LE). I think you can tell that the youngster is glad to see him.
You have to admire the classic lines of the SHBA. The gentle downward sweep of the spine as it flows toward a sharp and quite useful tip. The simple belly, useful for all knife and camping chores. And especially that outstanding grip -- it seems hand-shaped and it is very three dimensional, filling your palm completely. In fact, for a "little" knife, this SHBA feels very substantial in the hand. It's almost impossible to lose hold of that excellent straight handle.
When you get the rare chance to meet a classic like this, it's always good to bring out a few comparables. There are many, many choices in this class -- here are just a few (the ones that fit into a shot with my nice Canon):
I won't be cruel. Here they are from the bottom: R.A.T. 4S, Meaner SE07, BATAC SE07, SAR4 LE, SHBA, SAR5 (of course), Ratmandu, and R.A.T. 6S.
Here's the bottoms-up view, for those who prefer it:
The SARs (4 and 5) have more belly than the old SHBA:
But I prefer the tip on the SHBA, I think -- easier to drill with and nice for detail work on fruits and vegetables. The handle? For me, with my meaty but medium-sized hands, the SHBA wins, followed somewhat closely by the SAR4, with the SAR5 a distant third. I have to give a nod to the longer and very substantial SAR4 handle for controllability, though. I think Jerry is on to something (no surprise) with this new handle.
Oddly enough, I think the Ratmandu is a good comparable to the SHBA:
The Ratmandu's blade is a little longer and is still good for point work. The SHBA's handle is more filling, but the Ratmandu handle feels very good, too ... excellent for finger control in the kitchen. The SHBA is chunkier and feels more centered, somehow:
Here he is with a young friend, the SAR4 (LE). I think you can tell that the youngster is glad to see him.
You have to admire the classic lines of the SHBA. The gentle downward sweep of the spine as it flows toward a sharp and quite useful tip. The simple belly, useful for all knife and camping chores. And especially that outstanding grip -- it seems hand-shaped and it is very three dimensional, filling your palm completely. In fact, for a "little" knife, this SHBA feels very substantial in the hand. It's almost impossible to lose hold of that excellent straight handle.
When you get the rare chance to meet a classic like this, it's always good to bring out a few comparables. There are many, many choices in this class -- here are just a few (the ones that fit into a shot with my nice Canon):
I won't be cruel. Here they are from the bottom: R.A.T. 4S, Meaner SE07, BATAC SE07, SAR4 LE, SHBA, SAR5 (of course), Ratmandu, and R.A.T. 6S.
Here's the bottoms-up view, for those who prefer it:
The SARs (4 and 5) have more belly than the old SHBA:
But I prefer the tip on the SHBA, I think -- easier to drill with and nice for detail work on fruits and vegetables. The handle? For me, with my meaty but medium-sized hands, the SHBA wins, followed somewhat closely by the SAR4, with the SAR5 a distant third. I have to give a nod to the longer and very substantial SAR4 handle for controllability, though. I think Jerry is on to something (no surprise) with this new handle.
Oddly enough, I think the Ratmandu is a good comparable to the SHBA:
The Ratmandu's blade is a little longer and is still good for point work. The SHBA's handle is more filling, but the Ratmandu handle feels very good, too ... excellent for finger control in the kitchen. The SHBA is chunkier and feels more centered, somehow: