- Joined
- Aug 18, 2005
- Messages
- 33
Was in Arkansas over the weekend and bought a RAT 3, had been deciding between it and the ESEE for a month or so. Went back and forth, stopped at AG Russell and they had the RAT but no ESEE for comparison - seemed like a solid knife so I went ahead and got the RAT.
I probably carry a knife more than I use it....so for me the sheath is VERY important. My knife shelf is full of excellent knifes that never see the light of day because the sheath is poorly executed therefore I wont carry them.
The sheath on the RAT 3 seemed excellent. The Tek-Lok is a great attachment point (I use BladeTech holsters and mag holders so I was familiar with them). Retention is good, which is important as I intend to carry this in uniform and likely horizontal across my belt line when Im not using it for general camping.
I take my new knife and tuck it in the bottom of the saddlebags and ride off. After a couple days of vacation I get home, go to setup my sheath the way I want for daily carry and find the sheath is separated at one of the rivets. Retention is affected as you would expect.
I had to leave again for work - figured Id send an email and get it all squared away from the road (arent smart phones great these days).
Got ahold of the folks at Ontario and they requested pictures, reasonable enough but Im not with the knife so I cannot do that. When I get back Im going camping.....and that was the reason for purchase. I will not have time for pictures and hoop jumping to get the product squared away.
Im going to be real close to Smokey Mountain Knifeworks today and tomorrow - thinking Im going to grab the ESEE so Im good to go camping when I get home. I can compare there but anyone own both the RAT and the ESEE?
The knife itself seems well made, guessing for my uses I would have never seen any difference between it and the ESEE. I AM a big fan of the sheath design - seems well thought out. Albeit my RAT 3 will likely be returned unused as I see no reason to have two very similar knifes.
I probably carry a knife more than I use it....so for me the sheath is VERY important. My knife shelf is full of excellent knifes that never see the light of day because the sheath is poorly executed therefore I wont carry them.
The sheath on the RAT 3 seemed excellent. The Tek-Lok is a great attachment point (I use BladeTech holsters and mag holders so I was familiar with them). Retention is good, which is important as I intend to carry this in uniform and likely horizontal across my belt line when Im not using it for general camping.
I take my new knife and tuck it in the bottom of the saddlebags and ride off. After a couple days of vacation I get home, go to setup my sheath the way I want for daily carry and find the sheath is separated at one of the rivets. Retention is affected as you would expect.
I had to leave again for work - figured Id send an email and get it all squared away from the road (arent smart phones great these days).
Got ahold of the folks at Ontario and they requested pictures, reasonable enough but Im not with the knife so I cannot do that. When I get back Im going camping.....and that was the reason for purchase. I will not have time for pictures and hoop jumping to get the product squared away.
Im going to be real close to Smokey Mountain Knifeworks today and tomorrow - thinking Im going to grab the ESEE so Im good to go camping when I get home. I can compare there but anyone own both the RAT and the ESEE?
The knife itself seems well made, guessing for my uses I would have never seen any difference between it and the ESEE. I AM a big fan of the sheath design - seems well thought out. Albeit my RAT 3 will likely be returned unused as I see no reason to have two very similar knifes.