silenthunterstudios
Slipjoint Addict
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2005
- Messages
- 20,039
I have been a fan of Jackie Chan since Rumble in the Bronx, one of the first Jackie Chan movies that made it into the mainstream American audience. I was hooked after seeing both Drunken Master movies, and with the help of a buddy who was a big martial arts fan, got a lot of different Chan movies. There were some flops, some so bad you just had to laugh, some where the dubbing was so bad that you didn't know what was going on. Both Rush Hour movies (never saw the third). After Rush Hour 2, I didn't see many more.
I saw Shinjuku Incident advertised in several trade magazines, saw it on IMDB, a couple trailers on some DVDs. It looked interesting, Jackie Chan as a bad guy.
SPOILERS AHEAD!
I was surprised at how good it was, and how quickly it turned to crap. The movie started out pretty good, if you could believe Jackie Chan was a guy in his late 30's, early 40's (he's in his mid 50's). Basically, he's an illegal immigrant from China, looking for work in Japan. Working crappy, literally, jobs that most Japanese won't do, he and his "family" are abused. It's almost a little like Scarface, as he starts building his criminal empire, with the help of the Yakuza. It was surprising and neat to see Jackie Chan as a bad guy, albeit with a heart of gold. He justifies his assassinations of Yakuza heads as being beneficial to all Chinese immigrants to Japan. The beginning was well done, the middle was really neat, basically because audiences have never seen Jackie Chan as a bad guy, let alone kill anyone before, in cold blood no less. I think Jackie Chan is just as surprised as his character when he shoots his first target. He tries to get the feel of Don Corleone from the Godfather, knowing he built a business based on crime, but not wanting that life for his kids, Jackie's brother and family in this movie. Jackie Chan tried to convey that through his character, but doesn't get the job done. The ending basically falls on its face, but is still entertaining.
There is a lot more to the movie, but you have to see it if you are a fan of Hong Kong action movies, or Jackie Chan. It was a surprising turn for Jackie, and I really enjoyed it.
I saw Shinjuku Incident advertised in several trade magazines, saw it on IMDB, a couple trailers on some DVDs. It looked interesting, Jackie Chan as a bad guy.
SPOILERS AHEAD!
I was surprised at how good it was, and how quickly it turned to crap. The movie started out pretty good, if you could believe Jackie Chan was a guy in his late 30's, early 40's (he's in his mid 50's). Basically, he's an illegal immigrant from China, looking for work in Japan. Working crappy, literally, jobs that most Japanese won't do, he and his "family" are abused. It's almost a little like Scarface, as he starts building his criminal empire, with the help of the Yakuza. It was surprising and neat to see Jackie Chan as a bad guy, albeit with a heart of gold. He justifies his assassinations of Yakuza heads as being beneficial to all Chinese immigrants to Japan. The beginning was well done, the middle was really neat, basically because audiences have never seen Jackie Chan as a bad guy, let alone kill anyone before, in cold blood no less. I think Jackie Chan is just as surprised as his character when he shoots his first target. He tries to get the feel of Don Corleone from the Godfather, knowing he built a business based on crime, but not wanting that life for his kids, Jackie's brother and family in this movie. Jackie Chan tried to convey that through his character, but doesn't get the job done. The ending basically falls on its face, but is still entertaining.
There is a lot more to the movie, but you have to see it if you are a fan of Hong Kong action movies, or Jackie Chan. It was a surprising turn for Jackie, and I really enjoyed it.