Shock , hypothermia similar in some ways ?

Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
4,106
I was thinking of my less than rudimentary first aid courses in my youth . Among the enemies to fight against was shock . Keep em warm was the advice pounded into us .

While I am sure they are as dissimilar as their causes are there paralells between the two ? Are there other ways to keep people from shock aside from keeping them warm?
 
Yes; what is happening in shock and hypothermia is that blood is concentrated around the vital organs; the heart and brain - these are the bodies' most important organs and thus the body protects them at all costs, even if it means not giving blood to outer limbs. The similiarities end there though.

Hypothermia must be treated as a critical injury and intensive action is required - get patient into shelter and warm up with hot drinks, hot water bottles if available or body to body heat exchange. DO NOT USE ALCOHOL as a 'hot drink'.

Shock is different; it can result from a sever psychological trauma or can result from injuries.
The most important thing is first elevating legs if there is no injury which would dictate otherwise - this will concentrate blood around vital organs via gravity.
Second and almost just as important is reassurance; positive speaking, take the patients' mind off what just happened and speak with absolute confidence when you assure them that they will be okay. Continually reassure patient and bring their thoughts back to the positive, even if that means telling them not to think about their buddies who are dead or dying but instead to focus on themselves -it's psychological.
A patient may hav elife threatening wounds, but if you can turn their thoughts in a positive direction this may in fact save their life (even though you've given all the correct first aid you can). If a patient continues to retreat into shock then the psychogical trauma will in turn affect their physiology and they may very well die. Up-shot is; reassuring someone and keeping their thoughts positive may well be the most important first-aid you can deliver.
 
Well...

Let's keep this basic. Shock is a drop in blood pressure. Typically, someone gets into shock when their systolic pressure drops below 80 mm Hg. But a friend of mine (paramedic) has seen a woman whose systolic BP was UNDETECTABLE and who was still running around and screaming, so it's not, apparently, an absolute rule :)

As a rule of thumb, blood pressure is determined by three things : cardiac output, blood volume and the blood vessel's resistance.

There are four causes for such a drop in blood pressure... but actually it's three :

1) Lack of blood VOLUME : this is called the hypovolemic shock. It's typically what happens when you bleed too much, or when you're severely dehydrated, when you're badly burnt and loose physiologic fluids, etc.

2) The pump fails to push hard enough : this is the cardiogenic shock, which often happens when the heart, for some reason, does not have enough power to maintain the blood pressure high enough.

3) The allergic shock (anaphylactic shock) happens because our blood vessels are dilated by the chemicals produced massively by our immune system. As the blood vessels expand, there is more room for blood in the system and pressure drops.

4) The sceptic shock (cause by generalized infection), follows more or less the same rules as the allergic shock : the blood vessels expand.

What happends when such a thing happens is that the person more or less loses consciousness. In order to get the blood pressure back up, the whole system starts to fight hard : heart rate increases, peripheral blood vessels shrink down, etc. All the blood is concentrated around the center of mass : brain, heart, lungs.

So the skin is pale, the pulse is fast, yet kinda weak under the finger. The person will often experience nausea/vomiting, huge thrist and extreme coldness everywhere. This is typically why we keep'em warm. It will reassure them and it also will help the shock to dissipate afterwards.

What to do ?

Elevating the legs is good in theory, but practically it has little benefits as the blood vessels in the legs already contracted and pushed out the blood. It's also a risk as you never know if a victim has some hidden trauma.

Protect the victim from any danger source, stop bleeding if it's there, and seek medical assistance. If you're neck deep in a survival situation and there's no medical help but you, here's the guidelines :

The victim should ideally lay down. Most of them will be found that way anyways. Always check for airways. If vomiting, bleeding near/in the airways, etc, the victim must be put in lateral safety position (or whatever it's called over there) : mouth lower than the aiways so fluids will pour out by themselves. The rest is details.

Even if you suspect a spinal trauma, you must make sure the airways are free. This means you check the victim closely and as soon as there is an airways problem you move... and if you must leave the area, turn the victim on his/her side and make sure the fluids will pour out (there is a simple and effective technique to do that safely, and with minimal stress on an injured spine, you should seek a course and learn it !!!).

The victim should not be given to drink (risk of vomiting, not mentioning complications with an eventual anesthesia).

Depending on the cause of the shock, treatment will either be to

1) give back blood volume (IV), or in some cases it can be done rectally but I won't get into this here ::)
2) stimulate the heart function (with drugs, if you're not a doc you don't need this info, if you're a doc, you don't need this info).
3) shrink the blood vessels back to normal AND stimulate heart function, with drugs as well (same remarks, except for allergic people : carry your adrenalin/epinephrin/epipen/etc.).

Reassuring the person WILL help a lot. A positive mindset and the urge to fight and survive are often procuring the person with their own self-produced set of drugs and that does help a lot. Just never let them quit.

Cheers,

David
 
Things change in First Aid. You see that if you've lived long enough and pay attention. (E.g.: Now Harvard medical School is questioning if chest compressions are not just as good done without ventilation.)

As for lifting the legs above the head, some of those suggesting it (in absence of injuries contra-indicating that treatment) are:

American Red Cross
St. John Ambulance
Mayo Clinic
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration
American Institute for Preventive Medicine
U.S. Centers for Disease Control
U.S. Army

YMMV.
 
True, true.

That being said, once the legs are up you can hardly put them back down, otherwise you might create a relative hypovolemic shock (sudden lowering of blood pressure, which can lead to major circulation problems). So what do you do if the victim loses consciousness and must be turned on his/her side ? What do you do if you need to move/evacuate the victim ?

Theorically speaking the Trendelenburg position is a good idea on a CONSCIOUS victim, but from a practical point of view, it is less and less recommended unless in a medical setup, and even then.

As far as "Things change in First Aid. You see that if you've lived long enough and pay attention."... I'll have to send you back that one : the Tredelenburg position was first proposed as a shock treatment during WWI (one... !) (by Walter Cannon). This ain't new stuff. If it DOES raises blood pressure, it does not increases cardiac output nor improves circulation. It also impairs proper ventilation in some cases. Considering the questionable benefits, the numerous risks (aggravating hidden spinal trauma, internal hemorragy above the hips, hastened cerebral oedema, relative hypovolemic shock if you put the legs back down too fast, ocular problems, etc, etc.), I do think this is so often contra-indicated that it should not even be proposed on a public forum. There is something almost religious about that head-down tilt/leg elevation I fail to understand.

But that's just my opinion. I'm no authority in this field at all. I just read :

Myth: The Trendelenburg position improves circulation in cases of shock, S. Johnson, S.O. Henderson, Canadian Journal of Emergency Medecine vol. 6(1), pp48–49, 2004

The Trendelenburg position: a review of current slants about head down tilt.

If you have contradicting data, of course, I'm interested :jerkit:

Cheers,

David
 
Back
Top