- Joined
- Jul 28, 2003
- Messages
- 2,790
The Sig p226 is the main competitor with a Kimber Royal II in my search for a great CCW pistol. I'd get the p226 in .40 SW or .357 SIG (having the option to swap barrels and calibers).
I like the idea of carrying the 1911 cocked and locked, and in fact prefer to have this configuration in single action to double action, but why would anyone get a SAO 226? Does it change the trigger pull weights? You can't leave a 226 cocked and locked, only cocked with the risk of an unlikely but possible accidental trigger pull. So what is the advantage of SAO over DA/SA in this case? It seems like SAO would just eliminate the option of shooting the first round double action, making you have to cock the hammer before the shot or carry hammer up at your own risk (which you could still do with a DA/SA). Is there something I'm missing here? Is it just for the sake of not having a DA mechanism in the gun?
Hope that all made sense
I like the idea of carrying the 1911 cocked and locked, and in fact prefer to have this configuration in single action to double action, but why would anyone get a SAO 226? Does it change the trigger pull weights? You can't leave a 226 cocked and locked, only cocked with the risk of an unlikely but possible accidental trigger pull. So what is the advantage of SAO over DA/SA in this case? It seems like SAO would just eliminate the option of shooting the first round double action, making you have to cock the hammer before the shot or carry hammer up at your own risk (which you could still do with a DA/SA). Is there something I'm missing here? Is it just for the sake of not having a DA mechanism in the gun?

Hope that all made sense
