Skip the 5, and just get the 6?

link2derek

link2derek

Joined
Oct 8, 2010
Messages
8,340
So I recently added a few 3's and 4's to the collection -- the 3's impressed me, and the 4's impressed me even more:

IMG_8581ac.jpg


IMG_8589ac.jpg


IMG_8562ac.jpg


Now I want either a 5 or a 6, which will be used specifically for firewood processing and heavy batoning.
I have medium-sized hands, and my concern is that the 5's handle may be a bit overwhelming. The 6's handle looks to have a slimmer profile.
I'd appreciate some input, especially from those of you with medium-sized hands.

Thanks in advance. . . .
 
You'll be happy with either. It just comes down to personal preference. For me I like a thicker blade for batoning but others will really like the extra length that the 6 adds.
 
If you want to do a lot of wood processing and batoning a hatchet would do you better IMHO. Between the 5 and the 6, my theoretical knowledge of the two says the 6 will do you best.

God bless,
Adam
 
I've posted this before, the 3/16 in. blade(more than adequate) and the added length make the 6 the choice for me in batoning

I really can't justify owning the 5 for me personally
 
Thanks for all the quick replies, guys. I was leaning towards the 6 when I posted, and my instinct seems to be accurate.

Anyone find the 5's handle too cumbersome?
 
In real world use, there's not much difference in batoning. I do like the 6 better for making curlies. The handle is effectively the same for both. The 5 is a little bit harder to start, due the the saber grind. And obviously the 6 is a little bit longer. I try to keep the stuff I'm busting open under 4 inches anyways, so it's not a big deal.

My recommendation is usually the 6, and it's what usually winds up on my belt. But I haven't sold my 5, so there must be a reason.
 
hi, the handles are just about the same the 5 is slightly thicker but not enough to matter. i have medium sized hands. i was curious about batoning with both as well so i took them out the other day and banged on some pecan i had laying around. that was some hard wood.

the 5 was much more difficult to baton with. it took more effort and harder hits on the spine to go through the logs. the 6 went through alot easier i think the full flat of the 6 is the reason. the saber grind of the 5 makes a more abrupt angle change and the thickness of the spine really made it more work.

take it easy
cricket
 
Thanks for the great comments, cricket. The grind was one thing I had failed to consider. It looks like the 6 is it!
 
gundude73 said:
does it really matter which you get? you know you will end up with both :D :cool:
Click to expand...

I hear ya'! But believe it or not, I'm planning on getting two of whichever model I go with. So, if I'm going to prefer the 6 in the field, then I'd rather have two 6's than a 6 and a 5 that doesn't get used.

Of course, you never know. . . .
045.gif
 
gundude73 said:
does it really matter which you get? you know you will end up with both :D :cool:
Click to expand...

I finally realized this just before posting my questions on which is better and why. I first started with the 3 and a couple days later I knew I had to have a little bit larger blade. Now it's just down to which one next...5 or 6. I know I want an Izzy too. I hate that they made these knives because it's so hard to stop buying. :D I even got dragged into Beckers!
 
link2derek said:
I hear ya'! But believe it or not, I'm planning on getting two of whichever model I go with. So, if I'm going to prefer the 6 in the field, then I'd rather have two 6's than a 6 and a 5 that doesn't get used.

Of course, you never know. . . .
045.gif
Click to expand...



I have two 6's if that tells you anything :) (time for a new family photo...I've added a few (or more) more)

4380638244_95176d246d_b.jpg
 
I’ve only had the 6 for a couple days, however I'm already impressed. :thumbup:
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top