Sean Yaw
Gold Member
- Joined
- Feb 26, 2019
- Messages
- 417
I am thinking about making a wharncliffe swayback slipjoint and found the following patter from Chris Crawford's repository:
https://chriscrawfordknives.com/fil...rns/2.75_Inch_Swayback_Jack_-_Raymon_Hunt.jpg
According to my (tenuous) understanding of slipjoints and physics, it is not a good idea to cut out a pattern for a spring that is under tension. The images in this pattern all show the spring under tension. Does anyone have any recommendations for how I should modify my tracing from these images to account for this concern? One thought was to just use it as is and put in the tension when I drill the final hole in the liners, but that would change the shape of the handle, so I am looking for a better solution from wiser people. Another solution is to just use a tried and true wharncliffe pattern (a la Tony Bose) and modify it to be a swayback. That is probably not a bad solution.
https://chriscrawfordknives.com/fil...rns/2.75_Inch_Swayback_Jack_-_Raymon_Hunt.jpg
According to my (tenuous) understanding of slipjoints and physics, it is not a good idea to cut out a pattern for a spring that is under tension. The images in this pattern all show the spring under tension. Does anyone have any recommendations for how I should modify my tracing from these images to account for this concern? One thought was to just use it as is and put in the tension when I drill the final hole in the liners, but that would change the shape of the handle, so I am looking for a better solution from wiser people. Another solution is to just use a tried and true wharncliffe pattern (a la Tony Bose) and modify it to be a swayback. That is probably not a bad solution.
Last edited: