Small mp3 players

Planterz

Іди на хуй Путін!
Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2004
Messages
24,617
I found a 4gig iPod Nano (3rd gen) last week, and even though I've only had it a few days, the little bugger is really starting to grow on me. However, it's only 4 gigs and I quickly filled it up with about 430 songs. Of course, I'm not complaining, but it has me pondering getting something better. I already have a 160gig iPod Classic, but it's size/weight makes it more something I'd carry somewhere in my backpack rather than slip into a pocket for quick ride/walk. Mostly I listen to music while on the go on my cell phone, but it's a pain to have to pull it out of my pocket (especially while riding my bike) to change songs or whatever. Plus I'm in the market for a new phone that's even bigger than my current one, which would make doing that even more annoying.

I think that's why this little Nano is growing on me. It's thin, and small enough to fit in the coin pocket of my pants.

But I need more capacity. I have A LOT of music.

Obviously I'm aware of newer and higher capacity iPod Nanos. I think I would have preferred the 5th gen over the 6th gen with the touch screen, but NOS 5th gen ones are stupefyingly expensive (probably because, like me, people prefer them). I've also been looking at the Sandisk Sansa Clip line. These look pretty cool, since they also have a MicroSD slot (which are available up to 32gb), which means you can get 40 gigs of music space for less than $100. However reviews seem spotty - it appears it's relatively possible to get a lemon and/or have durability issues. They're also apparently slow to use when the music is on the SD card.

Beyond that, I simply don't know what's out there, and would like some education and opinions.

Here's what I'd like in such an mp3 player:

Small size. The smaller, thinner, and lighter, the better. I'd also prefer it to be more square rather than long and narrow.
Screen size/resolution doesn't matter as long as it's enough to display what's necessary and navigate around. Obviously I need a screen though (no iPod Shuffles). I'd prefer not to have a touch screen.
FM radio would be nice, but not a deal breaker if it doesn't.
At least 8gb. 16+ preferred. MicroSD expandable would be great, but I don't know if anybody other than Sandisk has this.
A clip would be nice, especially if it's removable/replaceable.

Obviously the iPod is the gold standard, but it has some disadvantages (at least how I see it):

Expensive.
I $@#&ing HATE iTunes. Yes I use it with my Classic and my Nano, but I'd still prefer drag-and-drop, especially for an on-the-go player that I can load/delete quickly.
Non-standard charger/connector. Why Apple insists on using their big, crappy plug-in instead of the now-universal micro USB, I cannot fathom. It's not like Macs don't have USB ports...
Not expandable. Why Apple refuses to make their iPods/iPhones expandable with MicroSD slots, I cannot fathom. Actually, I can. So they can get more money from their rabid fans every time they come out with a new one with higher capacity.
iTunes sucks. Yes, I mentioned this already, but it sucks so much I have to mention it twice.
Touch screens make me wary, especially this small.

However, there are some definite boons as well:
Build quality. iPods feel more solid and well built than other players.
FM radio. Hell, you can even rewind up to 15 minutes of what was playing.
Loooooooong battery life. Up to 24 hours advertized. I doubt anybody actually gets what's advertized, but everybody advertizes less, so the Nano should outlast any on a charge.
Very small. Just as long as I don't forget where it is and give it a washing machine ride.
Mono playback. That'd be great for clean-up time at work, where I could listen in one ear and keep the other ear free to hear the phone ring or converse.
Being an iPod, it works with all the doohickies made for them, like remotes and docks. Heck, they even make bands for them so you can wear it like a watch (you can set the display as a clock).

As for the Clip series, there's positives and negatives too:

Pros:

Cheap. Half the price for an 8gb Clip compared to an 8gb Nano
Expandable. For less than $100 you can get the Clip and a 32gb MicroSD card for 40 total gigs.
Drag-and-Drop music transfer. Not only easy to load, but easy to unload on somebody else's computer.
Micro USB charged/connected. There's always a couple charger cords lying around work and you don't need a special adapter to connect to somebody else's computer - they likely already have one.
FM radio
Wide format compatibility. It plays everything the iPod can and lots that the iPod can't.

Cons:
Cheap. By all reports it doesn't have a very high build quality.
Slow? By some reports it can take several seconds to skip songs. This would annoy the piss out of me.
Buggy? By reports there's some things that can make it hang or freeze, like a song with DRM or improperly formatted album art.


So, does anyone have any experience with either of these players? What else is out there that I should check out?

Thanks,
 
Last edited:
TL;DR? Sorry...Here's the Short Version:

What's the best small mp3 player out there? What do you have, and what do you think about it?
 
Well, scratch the Nano off of the (now very short) list. I was poking around the Amazon reviews and found that you can sort them to start with the "most helpful", and most of those reviews are rather unfavorable. Most commonly complained about are the screen being too small for a touch screen, the battery life being actually quite dismal if you have the screen on for any given time, and that it's a pain to skip songs because of the steps needed. The biggest killer is that, being a touch screen, there's no tactile feedback or indication of what you're doing, so you have to look at the screen. Since I'm often listening while riding my bike, that's not a good thing (something I know quite well about using my phone - which is why I've been enjoying my "new" Nano so much). Too much hassle for too much money.

5th Gen Nanos, as I said above, are stupefyingly expensive. $300 for the 16gb common colors (black/grey/white), and upwards of $500 for the more vibrant (and probably rarer) colors. 4th gen ones are just as expensive, even though the lack the FM radio and camera that the 5th gen added. Even 8gb 3rd gen Nanos are bringing over $200. WTF? This is one of the only cases I've seen where old/obsolete electronics go up in price.

The short list is now down to the Sansa Clip+ or the Clip Zip. But I still want to know what else is out there.
 
I've had very good luck with Creative Labs Zen players- no problems, easy to use and great features for the price- FM with presets, voice recording, etc. I don't know what their current line-up looks like, but I have a real small one I use at the gym that's got to be at least 4 years old.
 
I've been using the 8GB Sansa Clip+ daily for over a year now and as the prices have gone down on the MicroSD cards I've added a 32GB card for 40GB of total storage in a player no bigger than a matchbox. A 16GB card can be had for $15for 24GB of storage.

I had zero problems with the older Sansa Clip or my newer Clip+ holding up under daily use and if you like you can buy a silicone cover for it online for a couple bucks that will further protect it from a fall.

Right now with the 40GB of storage I have 76 full albums on my Clip+ and all of them are in FLAC format and 6 AudioBooks and I still have 2.90GB free.

A few weeks ago I bought the new FiiO E11 portable amp ($64 w/wall charger and extra battery thrown in) with the E11 I can drive any of my full sized cans even the AKG 701's from the little Clip+ and E11 and the sound is remarkable when you consider how little the source components cost. My everyday IEM's for the Clip+ are the Klipsch Image X5's which obviously are driven perfectly from the Clip+ alone.

I should add that I don't even have iTunes installed on my PC and with the Clip and Clip+ everything is just drag and drop.....as easy as adding things to a USB flash drive.
 
Last edited:
Go to a local school or a mall and ask the kids. They understand how to use tech much better than those who grew up without it or during the early days. I'm guessing their answer will be something like "you have 2 choices, an iPod or a ghetto-pod." At least that is what the kids around here would say.

While you do make some valid points when comparing specs on paper, real world use is quite different. Your hatred for iTunes and it's management abilities, which is far superior to manual management for 99% of users, has you now limited to "ghetto-pods". You will be buying a device that isn't worth it's manufacturing and distribution costs, has few to no accessories, includes 'features' that are of no practical value, and no real warranty or after sales support.

There is a reason why Apple owns the portable MP3 player market. And why they design and sell the devices they do. In short, it results from intensive market research and R&D.

I'd wish you luck, but I anticipate that it will be mostly bad unless you reevaluate your criteria.

Dave
 
I'm not so sure about about term "ghetto-pod" I guess it depends on what players you're talking about but we have two iPod's in my home (the 160GB iPod Classic and the iPod Nano) and the Sansa Clip+ sounds better than both.

There's no doubt that Apple should to be commended on the iPod but there are better sounding players on the market for a lot less money. Some people love iTunes and other don't, I prefer to drag any music I want onto my player just like its a USB drive without opening any other programs. It all depends on what you want, I want the best sound quality on the smallest/lightest player possible (with a menu) and the Sansa Clip+ fits that description perfectly.
 
Go to a local school or a mall and ask the kids. They understand how to use tech much better than those who grew up without it or during the early days. I'm guessing their answer will be something like "you have 2 choices, an iPod or a ghetto-pod." At least that is what the kids around here would say.

While you do make some valid points when comparing specs on paper, real world use is quite different. Your hatred for iTunes and it's management abilities, which is far superior to manual management for 99% of users, has you now limited to "ghetto-pods". You will be buying a device that isn't worth it's manufacturing and distribution costs, has few to no accessories, includes 'features' that are of no practical value, and no real warranty or after sales support.
A real iPod could very easily be a status symbol amongst kids, just as iPhone users are often snooty towards Android/Blackberry owners. I'm not anti-Apple (I have 3 iPods now), I just don't like how limited/limiting some of their products are. Stuff like iTunes (slow and cumbersome), non-removable batteries (on the iPhones), no expandable memory, etc. I don't know where you get this "no real warranty" idea, as all the major manufacturers have the same 1 year warranty that the iPods do, unless you're buying some junk brand.
 
Can the clip on the Clip be removed (or replaced if I break it off somwhow)?
 
Looking at my 8GB Clip+ I can't really tell, it doesn't slide on and off like the clip on the back of the original Sansa Clip but it also has an overall sturdier feel about it. I wouldn't be concerned, I used my first (original) 8GB Clip every single day for at least 2 years, I dropped it countless times and it still works like a champ.

I bought my 8GB Clip+ when they first came out due to reviews saying that it sounds even better than the first version (slightly) and because it has the memory card slot for expandability. These players are small but built rock solid, I've gone through multiple pairs of IEM's during the time I've used these two Sansa players. I have the silicone cover for both my Clip and Clip+ and it not only protects the player if it take a bad fall but the rubbery cover gives you a better grip and allows it to hold that much better when using the clip.

Review of the Clip+:
http://anythingbutipod.com/2009/08/sandisk-sansa-clip-plus-review/

Sansa is coming out with a new version of the Clip+ sometime in the near future called the Sansa Clip Zip that will feature a color screen. The color screen doesn't entice enough to me to upgrade because I usually start an album/CD and then track forward or backward with my thumb and index finger without even looking at the player attached to my jeans pocket. So the only time I look at the screen is when I'm choosing which album I want to listen to and from then on I make changes in volume or track number my feel alone.

Here is some info on the Clip Zip: http://anythingbutipod.com/2011/08/sandisk-reveals-sansa-clip-zip/

Several members of my family now own at least one version of the Sansa Clip because I've told them all that NOTHING I've ever bought for $50 (give or take) has given me SO many hours/months/years of enjoyment. It's a Hell of a bargain.

I also love the fact that the players sound so good that with the addition of an inexpensive portable amp like the FiiO E6 ($26) or my low cost fav the E11 ($64) you can drive full sized headphones with either player and get incredible sound. I have two desktop headphone amps, the Little Dot MKIII (tube amp) and the Benchmark DAC-1 Pre that I use in my office for serious HP listening. I still don't find the Clip+ lacking in sound quality even when driving my Grado 3251s or AKG 701's when combined with one of the inexpensive ($25-$64) FiiO portable amps.

Best of luck finding the right player of you!
 
Have you ever considered Rockbox for your current ipods? If you have a compatible model, it's worth it just to be rid of Itunes.

I was going to suggest a Rockbox'd 2nd gen Nano. . .
 
Have you ever considered Rockbox for your current ipods? If you have a compatible model, it's worth it just to be rid of Itunes.
I might try it on my old 40gb iPod Photo. The thing is a brick, and it takes 15 minutes or so to sync. My other iPods are too new (7th gen 160gb Classic and 3rd Gen 4gb Nano).

Finding a cheap 2nd gen Nano might be fun to play with. In the same plaza where I work is an Apple specialist store. They have a guy that repairs and rebuilds old iPods. Maybe they'll have something for cheap that I can pick up.
 
Well I have to say I'm biased because I'm an Apple user for 20+ years and owner of iPods and iPhones. It's been a while since I tried iTunes on Windows but I remember early versions weren't so great, so I sympathize with you if that's your situation.

I have a 2008 iMac and iTunes launches in literally 2 seconds, and performs perfectly everyday. For me, the music search, playlists and organization with iTunes outweighs being able to load music on an iPod like a connected hard drive. Turn off the automatic iPod syncing which is on by default and you're ready.

Those Nano prices you mentioned seem completely wrong. A brand new 16 gig iPod Nano is only $150. My son has a 5th gen Nano (the long type with the video and FM radio) and I frequently see used ones like it for sale for about $80 I think.

Things I don't like about the iPods are, like you said, non expandable space and inaccessible batteries. But the internal iPod batteries these days last for years without needing replaced. And if you encode all of your music at 128k AAC format, you'll save a lot of space. Some people insist on using 256k or 320k bitrate mp3's and those eat up a lot of space in large numbers.
 
im currently using a ipod nano 8GB.
i have the same complaints.... not enough storage, poor battery life, hate itunes, it acts weird when i plug it in to charge, difficult time syncing to itunes also.
this is my 4th ipod and will be my last apple product ever.
i had a ipod touch before this, and it broke from 2 drops of sweat.
had a ipod classic video, and it would freeze everytime it connected to itunes.

my nano now was a christmas present from last year... but at that time i was looking into the sandisk mp3 players...
i think its time to look back into the sansa....
 
I have an 8 Gig Nano. I like it. I don't know why the complaint about the screen size. It might be too small if you want it in order to watch videos or show pictures. But it works great for music. If I had my druthers, I druther have 16Gigs, but the base concept itself works for me.
 
My son has the last iPod Nano (tall thin) they made before the latest one that is rather small and square shaped and he likes it a lot but likes the Clip/Clip+ better for sound quality. I ONLY load the players with CD's/Albums that have been converted to FLAC. I never use MP3's, my main computer has just over 1500 full CD's/albums on it and they're all FLAC and as far as I know (I could be wrong) an iPod does not support FLAC.

I think that the iPod's are very cool, I even like the iPod touch but for someone like me, that has so much time invested into their computers music library it doesn't make sense to change to a player that does not support the file format that I use for digital music nor sound as good as a less expensive player. The Sansa Clip became so popular because is has much better than average sound quality combined with a very, very low price and now you can add a MicroSD card and have 40GB worth of space in a player no bigger than a matchbox.

IF I had started collecting music years ago in an Apple Lossless format I may have ended up using an iPod but I already had over a thousand CD's ripped to FLAC before I bought my first portable player so after reading dozens of audio reviews I gave the Sansa Clip a shot and I've never turned back. I couldn't care less about iTunes, I've used it before and know many people that love it....for all I know it is fantastic but I don't use it, I don't need it, I get most (not all) of my music from HDtracks and similar sites or I just order the CD and rip it with EAC.

HiFiMan also has a few GREAT sounding players on the market and all of them have a headphone amp built in.
 
Those Nano prices you mentioned seem completely wrong. A brand new 16 gig iPod Nano is only $150. My son has a 5th gen Nano (the long type with the video and FM radio) and I frequently see used ones like it for sale for about $80 I think.
They seem completely wrong to me too, but that's what they are. I'm talking about new (meaning not used) older generation Nanos. Old stock. Look them up on amazon or ebay. Used ones are of course far more reasonably priced, but I'm extremely wary of buying used electronics, especially something like an iPod. You never know how many times it's been dropped (on the ground, in the toilet, etc) or abused.

Things I don't like about the iPods are, like you said, non expandable space and inaccessible batteries. But the internal iPod batteries these days last for years without needing replaced.
I was referring to iPhones not having replaceable batteries. Every iPhone owner I've known is always charging their phone or complaining about not having a charger. I have a spare battery for my Droid that I keep in my backpack, just in case.
And if you encode all of your music at 128k AAC format, you'll save a lot of space. Some people insist on using 256k or 320k bitrate mp3's and those eat up a lot of space in large numbers.
128 bitrate sounds like ass to me. I don't need it FLAC, but 256 is the minimum for me. I can tell the difference between 256 and 320 if I'm wearing headphones and there's no external noise, but riding my bike or at work where there's lots of background noise, 256 is good enough.

My son has the last iPod Nano (tall thin) they made before the latest one that is rather small and square shaped and he likes it a lot but likes the Clip/Clip+ better for sound quality. I ONLY load the players with CD's/Albums that have been converted to FLAC. I never use MP3's, my main computer has just over 1500 full CD's/albums on it and they're all FLAC and as far as I know (I could be wrong) an iPod does not support FLAC.
I've got about 850 CDs myself and a ton of downloaded stuff. And you're right, the iPod doesn't support FLAC, just their own Apple lossless.

I think that the iPod's are very cool, I even like the iPod touch but for someone like me, that has so much time invested into their computers music library it doesn't make sense to change to a player that does not support the file format that I use for digital music nor sound as good as a less expensive player. The Sansa Clip became so popular because is has much better than average sound quality combined with a very, very low price and now you can add a MicroSD card and have 40GB worth of space in a player no bigger than a matchbox.
I'm with you on that. I went with a 160gb iPod for my main player based solely on sheer capacity vs size vs price. I was seriously considering a 500gb Archos tablet for a while before deciding on the iPod. But 40 gigs in such a small size might be the king of capacity/size ratio.

Regarding the Sansa Clip, how loud does it get? One thing that always annoyed me on my phone is when I can't get it loud enough. Some albums I have were ripped differently and are quieter and make me wish I could turn my phone up to 11 (1 louder than 10). My iPods though can easily go WAY louder (too loud), which allows me to listen to those quiet albums at the proper volume without re-ripping or converting the files (I can do it, it's just a PITA).
 
I know that the Clip+ doesn't play as loud as the original Clip but I never have trouble driving IEM's....now if I try to drive my full sized Grado's or especially my AKG's then I may have enough volume but you can tell that they're not getting the juice they need to sound their best.

When I want to use the Clip+ with my Grado's around the house I've been using my FiiO E11 ($64 w/extra battery and wall charger) and I can't get over how clean it sounds and it uses a rechargeable cellphone battery for 10-20 hours of use off of one charge. I haven't tried it but I hear that the new FiiO E6 ($26-28) sounds incredible......I had the E5 but to me it messed with the mid-range too munch for me to enjoy it but the E11 is stellar.

Best of luck!
 
Back
Top