Amoo did a great review on this popular topic here:
http://www.bladeforums.com/threads/small-sebenza-21-vs-small-inkosi-compare-and-contrast.1473182/
I wanted to offer my personal experience with these two knives without hijacking Amoo's thread.
First, my small 21. Personally, I prefer the design and construction of the Sebenza. I find the design sleeker and more timeless. The knife is long and lean. Also, I believe the execution of the pivot bushing is what separates CRK from other manufacturers. I prefer the grip of the 21. Opening the knife required a bit of a learning curve. After some break in and muscle memory, it can be opened slowly with control, or thumb flicked with confidence. The sound when it locks is awesome, and I realized that I did not know what perfect lock up and centering meant until I owned a Sebenza.
The Inkosi was my second purchase. Let me start with this; it is a fun knife. It is stout when compared to the Sebenza, but the differences are not dramatic. Forgoing the pivot bushing is a strange choice, but the lock up is still rock solid. The opening/closing process is where I feel the Inkosi shines. Like I said, it is just fun. I found it required no learning curve, and the knife is more forgiving to technique. As Amoo noted, is it the ceramic ball interface, the larger pivot, or the larger washers - maybe all 3. It thumb flicks as easily as my old mini-grip. Hell, you can even front flip it open with a little wrist. People say opening the Sebenza is akin to sliding two sheets of glass together. Opening the Inkosi is like rolling a marble around on a piece of glass. There is friction, but the resistance is minimal.
So here is my long and short. These knives get compared to each other, but they are two different knives that share nothing more than a heritage, material choices, and a few design cues. Another way to think of it would be comparing the Sebenza/Inkosi (or the Sebenza 21/Sebenza 25) to a 1967 Camaro vs a 2017 Camaro. The cars share a heritage, but offer dramatically different utility and user experiences. One is an icon, and the other was built after 50 years of invention and innovation.
I can not give a answer to "which one is better", but forced to keep just one, and I'll keep the Small Sebenza. It is the classic, and the hallmark of the brand. I'll also take the '67 Camaro.
Thanks for reading, and I hope this gives some perspectives to a future buyer.
http://www.bladeforums.com/threads/small-sebenza-21-vs-small-inkosi-compare-and-contrast.1473182/
I wanted to offer my personal experience with these two knives without hijacking Amoo's thread.
First, my small 21. Personally, I prefer the design and construction of the Sebenza. I find the design sleeker and more timeless. The knife is long and lean. Also, I believe the execution of the pivot bushing is what separates CRK from other manufacturers. I prefer the grip of the 21. Opening the knife required a bit of a learning curve. After some break in and muscle memory, it can be opened slowly with control, or thumb flicked with confidence. The sound when it locks is awesome, and I realized that I did not know what perfect lock up and centering meant until I owned a Sebenza.
The Inkosi was my second purchase. Let me start with this; it is a fun knife. It is stout when compared to the Sebenza, but the differences are not dramatic. Forgoing the pivot bushing is a strange choice, but the lock up is still rock solid. The opening/closing process is where I feel the Inkosi shines. Like I said, it is just fun. I found it required no learning curve, and the knife is more forgiving to technique. As Amoo noted, is it the ceramic ball interface, the larger pivot, or the larger washers - maybe all 3. It thumb flicks as easily as my old mini-grip. Hell, you can even front flip it open with a little wrist. People say opening the Sebenza is akin to sliding two sheets of glass together. Opening the Inkosi is like rolling a marble around on a piece of glass. There is friction, but the resistance is minimal.
So here is my long and short. These knives get compared to each other, but they are two different knives that share nothing more than a heritage, material choices, and a few design cues. Another way to think of it would be comparing the Sebenza/Inkosi (or the Sebenza 21/Sebenza 25) to a 1967 Camaro vs a 2017 Camaro. The cars share a heritage, but offer dramatically different utility and user experiences. One is an icon, and the other was built after 50 years of invention and innovation.
I can not give a answer to "which one is better", but forced to keep just one, and I'll keep the Small Sebenza. It is the classic, and the hallmark of the brand. I'll also take the '67 Camaro.
Thanks for reading, and I hope this gives some perspectives to a future buyer.