Smallest Knife You`re Confident In?

JK Knives

Moderator
Joined
Mar 6, 2001
Messages
28,074
I`m wondering what is the smallest knife you are confident in, or comfortable with, for your hiking, camping, or hunting use. I`m not talking batoning here, but if that is absolutely nessessary for you, that`s fine. I feel I could get by with a 2"-2 1/2" blade. What`s your choice, and why? If you have pictures, post them. I`m looking for good ideas for a new model, kind of an all purpose, always have it with you, knife.

John
 
Well. As far as a fixed blade. I feel totally confident in a 3in blade. I hate when a blade has to small of a handle, so 3.5in is good for me. Now to be fair, I really havent owned many smaller then that. I did have a Ranger little bird, but really didnt like it much. Way to small in the handle. Didnt feel like it had much controll. I would fare fine I guess with a blade length of 2in, and a 3.5in handle though for most cutting chores.
 
I don't like them if they are too small for my gorilla mitts.
Probably the smallest I like and use regularly is the Busse BAD (3.5" blade):
ETA: I did baton it through some pretty hard, seasoned wood to see how it would hold up -- it did fine.
100_0032.jpg

100_0037.jpg


Chopper approves, too:
100_0034.jpg
 
Last edited:
Hiking, camping, hunting as you say doesn't require much. I prefer a smaller blade for most tasks including cleaning deer.

For my neck of the woods, I wouldn't want less than a Bark River Mini Canadian from a blade length and heft standpoint. Although a SAK with woodsaw could work too. And its not for the fore mentioned activities, its for the times you need to make fire in wet weather and it would be a tough endeavor with a small knife.
 
My BGoode Grimlin. About 3 inches of blade, 4 inch handle. I could feel confident with a bit smaller blade and a bit smaller handle, but they have to be hand filling if used outside in winter.
 
After a steady lifelong evolution to smaller and smaller blades, I'm comfortable with any 2 to 2 1/2 inch blade. Its a cutting tool, and I find that adaquite grip is more important than blade length. If the ice man could get by with a 2 inch flint blade 5,000 years ago, thats good enough for me. If I was going in winter, I'd like to have a small hatchet or saw with me, if possable.

I've been using a small pocket fixed blade by Mike Miller, for a few months now, and its small enough that it goes in my right jeans pocket. About 2 inches in the blade, 4 3/4 overall, 3 1/2 onces in weight. cryo treated O1. Nice grey giraffe bone handles on full tang. it looks like a short mini chefs knifes, with a wide blade for such a short length, but it works out fantastic. So far, it's done everything I needed to do with a knife in day to day use. I have a black length of paracord as a llanyard from the sheath to the belt loop just in front of my pocket. I've been using it as an unfolding pocket knife. It's been perfect. If I had only one thing I would change, I'd like just a tiny skosh more handle. Not much, just a wee tiny bit.

Before Brett gave me this Mike Miller knife, I had gone to a Buck Hartsook for 99% of my edc pocket knife work.

With the exeption of chopping and battoning, I just don't need much blade for backpacking, canoe/kyaak camping, hiking, fishing. Look how our grandfathers got by with a single everyday pocket knife. Heck, look how our ancestors skinned game with a single flake off a flint nodual.

The Iceman had an influence on me, and made me really think about what I was carrying.

Small 2 inch blade knife and hatchet seems to be a good combo.
 
I don't care as much about short blades, something in the 3" range even would be fine (though a bit more is better since it will let me baton better). But I hate tiny handles! It's all for naught if I can't get a well controlled, comfortable grip on the blade.
 
I don't care as much about short blades, something in the 3" range even would be fine (though a bit more is better since it will let me baton better). But I hate tiny handles! It's all for naught if I can't get a well controlled, comfortable grip on the blade.

I remember, you like them thick!
 
I think something in the three inch range is acceptable, especially if its closer to 4 inches. I don't really see a point in making the handle overly small either.
 
The Bark River Woodland is my choice.
WoodlandGreenCanvas.jpg


What I'd really like to see is a small fixed blade knife that has the overall profile (both blade and handle) of a Sodbuster Jr. with a 3/4" blade height as opposed to the 5/8" height of the folder.

0095%20.jpg


Belly pushed forward, slight drop or clip point, and some wood or micarta w/lanyard hole.

HTH,
Chris
 
This is what I have been carrying. 3 " blade, 6 1/2" oal. I`m just thinking,how small can you go, without losing practicality?

1zc0bci.jpg
 
Hiking, camping, hunting as you say doesn't require much. I prefer a smaller blade for most tasks including cleaning deer.

For my neck of the woods, I wouldn't want less than a Bark River Mini Canadian from a blade length and heft standpoint. Although a SAK with woodsaw could work too. And its not for the fore mentioned activities, its for the times you need to make fire in wet weather and it would be a tough endeavor with a small knife.

It has a full handle as well
 
i would probably have to say: my BRKT little creek and/or my JK hikers back up... both small knives capable of big chores...:)
 
This is what I have been carrying. 3 " blade, 6 1/2" oal. I`m just thinking,how small can you go, without losing practicality?

1zc0bci.jpg

That would be about as small as I'd go....and the handle is just a bit short for my taste.
 
Back
Top