Like Bill, I don't think anybody "jumps the fence" by owning both GH and HI.
Although I do happen to disagree about the qualitative difference (reference Ghost Six's opinion that the engraved SN1 he got was as good as any khukuri and better than many), there's room at the table for everybody.
Personally, I think that one cannot say that "all GHs are better than HIs," or "all HIs are better than GHs." In my experience, I've seen and held both. I have seen models from both of us that, were they to be used as a reference to infer the overall quality of the entire line of GHs or HIs, would result in different conclusions.
Would it be fair to judge HI based upon those couple of broken tangs? Of course not. Would it be fair to judge GH on a one-year-ago model or the "gonesailing Panawal"? Also no.
Just my ruminations . . .