I believe I read a test where a Sebenza was driven into a tree stump with a sledgehammer. Several other "hard use knives" broke apart during this test.
OH BOY! You've got to post that one. -I'm off to search for it, and if I find it I'll post it. I agree, I find my Sebenza to be as "tough" as any knife I've used.
I also
disagree with DaveH. He is most assuredly
not a jerk.

But he does have a point. That is, decide (or discuss here if you're not certain) what you need or want in a folding knife.
It's easy
and common to become caught up in the idea, or the romance, or the fantasy, of the "toughest" knife. When one does, one really only has marketing to go by. Whoever sells their knives as the "toughest", this week, will be the ones one covets. Whichever manufacturer has the most vocal, aggressive fans trumpeting how "tough" their blades are will catch one's eye. Meanwhile, perhaps the owners of another manufacturer are too busy cutting things, or exploring, or serving their countries to post much.
My 2¢? Sebenzas
are tough, but CRK prefers you don't abuse them. They'll take it, but if you break it, it ain't free to fix. Spydercos are tough, but the same applies. Striders are tough, and those guys get a
kick out of it if you break it. -Even then though, while a free fix is nice, it doesn't put a knife in your pocket while yours is in for repair. And at $400 a pop, you might not have many spares.
I don't see my Seb breaking before an SNG. If I broke 'em both, the Seb is on me and the SNG is on Mick. -But then I'd just carry one of my Militaries.
I often debate (with myself) the merits of one "super-knife" vs. four or five "almost as goods."
Let's kick around what you actually want in a knife.
