sog flash 1 vs. buck avid small

Joined
Nov 27, 2012
Messages
11
I am looking at getting one of these knives can someone please compare them for me. Is the buck to thick for pocket edc? I am also interested in comparing the blade steels and handle materials. Thanks to all who reply. -Jake
 
I assume you mean Buck Vantage avid? It has Sandvik stainless and dymondwood scales. As far as I've heard, it's a good knife.

I have the small select model (340). It is thin and compact. I took the clip off and carry it as a pocketknife, no problem. These days, I think thinness is more important than light weight as far as comfort in the pocket goes. If you want to see my Vantage in action, watch the first minute or two of this vid:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JeWd2t_LZbk
 
Out of the two, I'd go with the Buck [Vantage] Avid.

Two reasons:
- From what I see, the lock on the SOG does not adjust for blade play as parts wear, so it may develop vertical play sooner. The Buck has the old fashioned liner lock that does adjust with wear.
- When I handled any of the SOG Flash/Trident/Aegis models, one-handed closing was annoying (borderline unsafe) due to the built up spring force. The Buck won't have this problem because it's not assisted.

But if you are still interested in a SOG, buy one with a see-through Arc Lock. That lock design will adjust with wear.
 
Last edited:
Below are some side-by-side pics of a Small Vantage Pro and SOG Flash 1. The Pro and Avid are the same design, but they have different blade and handle materials (S30V vs. Sandvik and G10 vs. Dymondwood).

I don't have experience with Buck's implementation of Sandvik 13C26, but I do with Kershaw's. If they treat it similarly, it should take a great edge with retention being a little better than AUS-8. Cutting edge on the Vantage is 2.5" vs. 2.25" on the Flash 1. The Vantage blade is 0.1" (2.5mm) thick and 7/8" wide, vs. the Flash 1 at 0.08" (2mm) thick and 5/8" wide. Vantage is hollow-ground vs. full flat ground on the SOG. Overall length of the Vantage is 6.125" vs 5.75" on the Flash.

Hand thickness of the Vantage is 0.47" (12mm) vs. 0.35" (9mm) on the Flash. I don't have my scale handy, but the Vantage is noticeably heavier. The Vantage is not particularly heavy, but the Flash is very very light (1.2oz). The way the handle is laid out, I get a 3-finger grip on both knives. The Vantage handle is longer, but the flipper prevents gripping the top 1/2" or so of the handle. The wider handle of the Vantage does make it easier to grip though.

My Vantage is perfectly centered with no blade play at all, but there are accounts from others on the forums that were not so fortunate. Buck does carry a lifetime warranty, so if yours has problems, you can get it fixed. The Flash does have a very small amount of blade play on account of the lack of steel liners. FRN, while very tough, is not the most rigid handle material. As such, it does flex somewhat, which results in blade play on the Flash. In exchange, though, is the Flash is very light.

I like both knives, but I'd probably lean a little more in favor of the Flash 1. It really is unnoticeable when you're carrying it, and it is more than adequate for light and moderate cutting tasks. While the Vantage does feel sturdier, if I find myself needing a more solid/hefty knife (eg. for repeated heavier cutting tasks), I'd look for a larger knife (mainly a larger handle, where I can get a good 4-finger grip).

Vantage_Flash1_Open2_800x373.jpg


Vantage_Flash1_Thickness_800x595.jpg


Vantage_Flash1_Pocket_800x470.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top