Ban
Moderator
- Joined
- Oct 14, 1998
- Messages
- 4,942
Did some performance testing of my FABM and my Anorexic BIBB the last couple of days.
Just did some chopping of seasoned 2X4's to see how they performed against relatively dry and hard wood.
Basically, I would chop at the 2X4 on one side until it was half-way through then flipped it over and repeated the process until it was finally cut clean off.
My FABM was able to go through the 2X4 in approximately 36-40 chops.
My modified Thin BIBB was able to do it in a average of 60 chops which is very close to a standard CGFBM. Both Wash and I agreed that the chopping performance between the 2 is very close. I would have to say that the Anorexic BIBB put up a stellar performance considering that it was only about half the weight of a CGFBM.
I would like to try a standard FFBM to see how it compares.
My FABM
and Anorexic BIBB
Anorexic BIBB in between a NO-E and BM-E
[img]http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=75184&d=1184132871
Just did some chopping of seasoned 2X4's to see how they performed against relatively dry and hard wood.
Basically, I would chop at the 2X4 on one side until it was half-way through then flipped it over and repeated the process until it was finally cut clean off.
My FABM was able to go through the 2X4 in approximately 36-40 chops.
My modified Thin BIBB was able to do it in a average of 60 chops which is very close to a standard CGFBM. Both Wash and I agreed that the chopping performance between the 2 is very close. I would have to say that the Anorexic BIBB put up a stellar performance considering that it was only about half the weight of a CGFBM.
I would like to try a standard FFBM to see how it compares.
My FABM
and Anorexic BIBB
Anorexic BIBB in between a NO-E and BM-E
[img]http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=75184&d=1184132871