SPARK: Please Remove Retalitory Negative Feedback Members: "rio" "hancea"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Jun 28, 2013
Messages
5,403
Spark,

Respectfully requesting that you remove the retaliatory negative feedback that was left for 2 of our member's here, over transactions that never occurred (direct violation of BF rules). The member's whose reputations have been adversely affected, are: "rio" & "hancea"

Here is the thread that was posted by the OP (Natedog351) in the GBU:

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1255988-hancea-is-a-SCUMBAG-do-not-deal-with-him!

Furthermore: the OP left not one, but TWO, retaliatory negative feedbacks; even more troubling: his very ambiguous thread had pictures of a beautiful expensive custom that wasn't even for sale! When I first looked at his sales thread, even I was confused:

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1254521-Gareth-Bull-3-5-quot-framelock-shamwari

RevDevil's Avatar
RevDevil
RevDevil is offline Evil Super Moderator, yep...

Join Date:Nov 2009Location:ArizonaPosts:34,108Blog Entries:4

Quote Originally Posted by germaneye View Post

Looks like Natedog left negative feedback for another member "rio" tied to the same sale thread?
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/itrader.php?u=177896

Well now, that is interesting now isn't it? Using the iTrader system as a way to exact a measure of revenge or a way to say "FU". That is not a permissible way to act. Thanks for bringing that to light.


I would mean a lot to the honest, reputable member's of this awesome forum, if you would please look into this matter, & correct Natedog's blatant violation of BF rules.
 
Last edited:
Thank you Kelama for directing me here and starting this thread, I would also like help removing the negt feedback left by Natethedog in my feedback, heres the link;
http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/itrader.php?u=177896
he did it to another member here;

http://www.bladeforums.com/forums/showthread.php/1255988-hancea-is-a-SCUMBAG-do-not-deal-with-him!

You got it, buddy.

It took at least 6-8 weeks, for Spark to remove the unjust (against BF rules) negative feedback that was left for Eyedog. FYI: you will need to be persistent (bump the thread asking for updates), but eventually, he will look into this. It also helps, having RevDevil as your advocate! :thumbup:

Best of luck!
 
KELAMA thank you for starting this thread!I hope that Spark will understand this situation and will remove the negative feedback that was left for me and for RIO.
Natedog351 had no right to do this according to the rules of this forum.
Thank you!
 
Agreed the negative feedback needs to be removed. I understand that is not the process of reporting a negative experience with someone now.
 
Hi Spark,

Just wanted to bump this to the front, in the hopes that you'll see this.

Thanks!
 
You got it, buddy.

It took at least 6-8 weeks, for Spark to remove the unjust (against BF rules) negative feedback that was left for Eyedog. FYI: you will need to be persistent (bump the thread asking for updates), but eventually, he will look into this. It also helps, having RevDevil as your advocate! :thumbup:

Best of luck!

And if it had not been for you my friend I would still have the negative feedback.

Mike
 
I will bump this request thread, one last time.

I'll leave this up to the 3 member's involved, to keep this request active. This request, may take a little while for Spark to address, what I do know, if you don't keep this at the top, it will eventually drop back into the archives & into oblivion...

Good luck!
 
Spark, I can vouch for this being a legit request. A mistake was made in protocol by the issuer, warning issued and he acknowledged his mistake.
 
Given this, I would agree about RIO, BUT ask the same for me. Since not a single word was ever true. Not a word, regarding me. However it is sad to see anyone kicked in the teeth. My Itrade speaks for itself, but I still have members question my soiled reputation, but if you want my knives or money, you'll have to judge for yourself. Sure saved me a lot of GAWS and time helping anyone.. But despite a dark history, I was among the first to contact RIO offering help and understanding. Fair is Fair.. Rio was not at fault, nor I. But I have been told many times here, We are not pitching horseshoes. Rules may not apply. Good luck Rio, tough when others gang up on you, imagine having to live with that. rb black
 
President's Day bump, for removing some retaliatory feedback.

Thanks, President Spark! ;)
 
Please remove negative feedback for, Rio & Hancea.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top