Springfield XDM 3.8

Joined
Sep 2, 2004
Messages
5,250
I saw a review of this recently in Handgunner magazine and it got very good reviews. I believe its a full size xdm with a barrel .7" shorter than the full size. Seems to be an ideal combination of full size handling characteristics and enormous capacity with decent concealability.

Does anyone have one\shot one?

How does it stand up to its Glock competitors?
 
I work and train with firearms on a professional level and this is how I make my living so my comments are biased from this perspective. The XD series has been around since the Croatians introduced it in the 1990s as the HS2000 series. I remember my first experience with one in 1994 or so. Unfortunately their introduction was less than stellar and the gun failed to take hold in the US because of poor marketing.

Springfield, in a stroke of genius, saw its potential and made an exclusive deal with the manufacturer. They re-branded it and "sex'd it up" with some new packaging and a new name and the rest is history. They in recent years introduced the XDM series which is a nice enhancement.

Have I shot one? Ah, yea, many actually and with tens of thousands of rounds and I've seen literally millions of rounds go down range in training with these and other pistols.

I'm not exactly sure what you intend to do with this pistol. Your state enjoys conceal carry so if that is your gig, then the XDM series is a winner. They are extremely reliable, they seem to fit people's hands and they have what it takes to be a good choice for conceal carry, plinking or a woods gun.

I'd generally steer people toward the fuller size guns for personal defense and they generally are more reliable. When carrying concealed the .7 shorter barrel usually doesn't make any difference in concealment. It is usually the butt that gives people issues for concealment and is the most difficult to prevent from printing. There generally is no great advantage in having the shorter barrel really. It reduces your sight picture, it requires a some what stronger spring, and the ride is a little rougher. And the shorter barrel really doesn't offer you any great concealment advantage...we're talking just over a 1/2"....whoopie!

It is essentially a knock off of the GLOCK and a darn good one. When I say "knock-off" I'm not meaning a cheap imitation...but imitation is a form of flattery and the Croatians have done a very good job actually. This pistol is on my short list of recommendations to people for personal defense because of its reliability and its ability to fit a wide variety of hands.

GLOCK has been around longer, has around 70% of the LEO market share and is much easier to repair in the field because they allow any GSSF member access to their excellent armorer's course. GLOCK parts are extremely abundant and inexpensive. So for a SHTF pistol the GLOCK is a better choice (again, don't know what you intend to do with this handgun so I'm covering all bases here) because you can easily fix it yourself - cheaply.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for such a complete response. There would be no particular purpose for the gun other than plinking and I suppose home defense. Mainly, I'm interested because I don't own any automatics and want to get one. While I don't need a gun for concealed carry, I don't want something too big and heavy either. I do like the idea of the high capacity magazines because coming from a revolver background it is entirely different.

Thanks again.
 
Shann, I'm confident you'll find any of the XDM models not too big or heavy for your purpose. Also think in terms of "the smaller the gun the rougher the ride"...think of a car...a Volkswagen Beetle for example is going to have a rougher ride than a Suburban on the same road....so taking this analogy to the extreme...a smaller handgun/lighter-weight is going to be lighter to carry but more difficult to shoot relative to a larger/heavier handgun for the same cartridge. Also the smaller the handgun the heavier the spring making it more difficult to manipulate the slide - especially for those of us with lesser body mass or upper body strength - vis 'a vis women or smaller stature males (or folks with injuries).

If indeed the handgun is for home defense who says you'll be the one using it? Consider the big picture...think of anyone else and their potential state of mind and condition at the time of the attack. There is good chance your spouse, GF, son, daughter, and/or parent will need to defend him/herself with this handgun if you're not home or incapacitated. So select something that is conducive for others as well.

There is nothing wrong with a revolver...high capacity only means less manipulation while under stress and not necessarily greater effectiveness.

I'm glad you found my diatribe of value. Good luck in your decision.
 
Last edited:
I can't help but think with their emphasis on the "3.8" that they are pushing this gun towards the IDPA BUG class of shooters. It would be the ultimate "gamer" gun for that I think.
Like Quirt says, it's the butt, not the barrel that really determines conceal-ability particularly if you carry inside the waste band.
 
Back
Top