Spyderco Chaparral vs. Ritter Mini Griptilian

Joined
Oct 5, 2006
Messages
3,124
Spyderco Chaparral vs. Ritter Mini Griptilian

attachment.php


Introduction

I recently received a Spyderco Chaparral as part of a pass around here. Thanks to Sal Glesser and the fine folks at Spyderco for making the knife available and for BladeForums member JH for coordinating the pass-around. The Chaparral is a mini version of the Sage and Spyderco describes it as a gentleman’s folder.

I thought it might be useful to compare the Chaparral to my current EDC folder, the Ritter RSK MK1, commonly called the Ritter Grip. It’s really a Benchmade Mini Griptilian with a blade designed by Doug Ritter -- survival expert and founder of www.kniferights.org. The table below shows the difference in detail, but generally, the Ritter is the more useful knife and the Chaparral is the easier to carry and the more elegant.

attachment.php


Pocket Carry

I work in an office and would prefer that co-workers not notice my knife unless I want them to. I don’t use a clip and carry a knife in my dress pants. The Ritter Grip, however, is thick enough that it may be pretty recognizable as a knife. Not the Chaparral, though. The knife is remarkably thin -- especially if you remove the pocket clip. If you do prefer using a clip, though, the results are mixed. The Chaparral’s bronzed wire clip is less obtrusive, but the painted black old school clip on the Ritter Grip is more secure. Advantage: Chaparral.

attachment.php


Locking System

The best feature of the Ritter Grip (and of any Benchmade knife) is the AXIS lock. It is ultra smooth and effortless to open and close. The Chaparral is also very smooth and opens easily, but to me, the Ritter Grip is just a little better. The Chaparral uses a traditional back lock, which might be more secure, but I’ve never had an AXIS lock fail. Advantage: Ritter Grip.

Aesthetics

The twill carbon fiber scales and polished steel liners on the Chaparral just look a lot better than the stock plastic scales on the Ritter Grip. If you add $160 WilkinsGRIPS http://wilkins-knives.com/wilkinsgrip-stocklist, though, I think it becomes a toss-up. Of course, that more than doubles the cost of the knife. Advantage: Chaparral.

attachment.php


Handle Utility

I wear XL gloves and can (barely) get four fingers on the Ritter Grip handle. To get four fingers on the Chaparral, I have to use the choil. The Chaparral’s carbon fiber scales provide plenty of grip, but not as much as the checkering and jimping on the rounded Ritter Grip scales. Plus, I find the Chaparral’s liners a little sharp on my hand. Advantage: Ritter Grip.

Blade Utility

Which blade you find more useful will depend on what you like to cut. The Chaparral is the thinner, pointier, blade and scalpel sharp -- great for office work and light food prep. You lose about .30 in. of the blade length to the choil, however. The Ritter Grip blade is thicker with a stouter tip. You get more cutting edge, but it’s not the slicer that the Chaparral is. Overall, my preference is for the Ritter Grip. Advantage: Ritter Grip.

Intangibles

Spyderco is a great company with great products and has an active presence here on BladeForums. Its customer service has been terrific when I have needed it. Benchmade makes great products, too, but doesn’t participate in this forum and its customer service has been unresponsive when I have reached out. On the other hand, Doug Ritter has been leading the charge to protect our knife rights. Advantage: Spyderco

Conclusions on the Chaparral

Even as a Spyderco aficionado, I find the product line over the last few years to be a bit confusing. The carbon fiber versions of the Caly 3, Native, Sage, and now the Chaparral are awfully similar. The Chaparral is a great knife, but if you already have one of others I mentioned, I think you’ll be just fine. If you don’t have one though, and are looking for a very nice looking, very easy to carry, sharp little slicer, the Chaparral could be for you.

Conclusions on the Ritter Grip

The Benchmade Griptilian is an iconic knife for a reason, and the Ritter blade design makes it even better. If you don’t like the Ritter Grip, however, you can customize your own here: http://www.benchmade.com/customize/. You can choose from:

  • Griptilian (3.45 in. blade) or Mini-Grip (2.91 in.)
  • 12 different colors for the right side scale and 12 colors for the left
  • Plain edge or partially serrated
  • Drop-point, tanto, or sheepsfoot blade shape
  • Thumb stud or thumb hole
  • Satin or black blade finish
  • 154CM, D2, N680, or S30V steel
  • Silver or black AXIS lock and/or liners
  • Silver or black clip in standard or split arrow design and silver or black screws
  • Your own image or message laser etched on the blade
Thanks again to Spyderco for making the pass-around possible.

attachment.php
 
Last edited:
wow, nice work.

i've got both, and my conclusions are very similar.

'Nice' knife for work, envelopes, slicing - Chapparal; it's just such a phenomenal slicer i hate to use it for anything other than slicing/fine cutting. Looks very classy for public usage.

small knife that i don't sweat putting to work on boxes, cardboard, etc - Mini-Grip. also a good cutter, but just FEELS like i can beat on it a little if i need to.

they are both great blades. only change i'd make (and did) was to get an STR low-rider clip for my mini-grip. i'm a low-rider pocket clip kind of guy, and that made a huge carrying difference for me.

great review/pics.
 
Thanks, Lava, it's always fun to read your reviews. And not just because we seem to be attracted to many of the same knives.

These two folders are world-class and deserve their popularity.

The Chaparral's improved lock just may be the industry's best back-lock. It's rock-solid, opens smoothly and mine has been trouble-free.

Although it's hard to beat the Chaparrals for slicing, I prefer the larger Sage series overall for their one-handed closing.

Doug Ritter hit one out of the ballpark with the design of his blade for BM. The only let-down is the handle. What would it take for a company like BM to match the quality of the Kevin Wilkins scales?

All my large and small Ritters have aftermarket scales. Playing with my Ritters is one of my guilty pleasures.
 
Wow, great review. I own both of these knives and love them both dearly. For most of my EDC chores, I prefer to use the Ritter, but when I need something a little classier I usually slip the Chap into my pocket. I agree with your assertion that the Ritter might handle a little more aggressive use than the Chap, but then again, it almost seems like I purposely "baby" the Chap due to it's gentlemanly appearance. I hope that made sense. Either way, they are both winners and if I were to lose either one, I would replace them immediately without hesitation.
 
The Chaparral uses a traditional back lock, which might be more secure, but I’ve never had an AXIS lock fail. Advantage: Ritter Grip.

Actually, the Chaparral has an untraditional lock back - the blade has a pin that slides within a groove within the frame. This prevents vertical play associated with traditional lockbacks.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the look, nice job
I have a mini grip in my pocket right now. Would like to have the spyderco some day.
 
I agree with Lava's observation: the Ritter is the more useful folder while the Chaparral is more elegant and easier to carry.

For flashlight fans, the Chaparral is the EagleTac D25 of folding knives and the Ritter is the ZebraLight SC-52.

I wouldn't want to be without either.
 
wow, nice work.

i've got both, and my conclusions are very similar.

'Nice' knife for work, envelopes, slicing - Chapparal; it's just such a phenomenal slicer i hate to use it for anything other than slicing/fine cutting. Looks very classy for public usage.

small knife that i don't sweat putting to work on boxes, cardboard, etc - Mini-Grip. also a good cutter, but just FEELS like i can beat on it a little if i need to.

they are both great blades. only change i'd make (and did) was to get an STR low-rider clip for my mini-grip. i'm a low-rider pocket clip kind of guy, and that made a huge carrying difference for me.

great review/pics.

Can you please tell me more about this clip?
 
Very nice review & comparison. I see it about the same way as well. I did trade my Chap and still have the Ritter. The scales on the grips have been discussed ad-nauseam, but durability has never been an issue. Keeping these scales is what makes them very affordable!
 
Thanks for posting this review. I've owned the Ritter Mini-Grip and am now considering a Chaparral, so this review was very useful to me.
 
One thing the Chaparral does extremely well, especially without the clip, is being >>>thin<<<.
 
One thing the Chaparral does extremely well, especially without the clip, is being >>>thin<<<.

Yea, I noticed that. I once had a Delica-4, but it was too big for me to EDC. Someone told me about the Chaparral and I feel in love with the looks of it, especially the blade profile. I had know it was thin, but just today, I learned the blade was actually thinner than the blade of a Dragonfly-2. I'm not sure I should be concerned about that or not. I have the DF-2 and can't imagine a blade being thinner than that and still being able to perform mild tasks without snapping in half or chipping. I'd have no intent to chop a tree down with it, but it may actually get "used". Learning the blade is so thin has me worried now.
 
Yea, I noticed that. I once had a Delica-4, but it was too big for me to EDC. Someone told me about the Chaparral and I feel in love with the looks of it, especially the blade profile. I had know it was thin, but just today, I learned the blade was actually thinner than the blade of a Dragonfly-2. I'm not sure I should be concerned about that or not. I have the DF-2 and can't imagine a blade being thinner than that and still being able to perform mild tasks without snapping in half or chipping. I'd have no intent to chop a tree down with it, but it may actually get "used". Learning the blade is so thin has me worried now.

I don't know what you're cutting, but I bet there's no reason to worry. :)
 
The knives are really very different with different purposes. The Chaparral is a modern version of a gent's knife, while the different forms of the Grip are pure users, for rougher work. I have mini grips with blades of 154CM and one in M4. I drop a min grip in my pocket if I go out to work in the yard.
A closer comparison would be between the Sequel 707 and the Chaparral. These are two of my favorite knives, with the Sequel getting more pocket time. The Chaparral is more appropriate in an office or work environment (but this depends on the sort of work you do).
 
Back
Top