45Wheelgun
The Sharpest Knife in the Drawer
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2014
- Messages
- 84
Gents - hoping to gather advice from the Spyderco experts here on BF.
Trying to make the decision on which of these knives will become my "Sunday go to meetin' " (dress) knife.
Some background on me and my taste in knives. I've been knife collecting for 35 years and have several hundred knives primarily focused on pre-WWII knives and military blades. Recently, I have been turn on to more modern knives and steels by a good friend who thought I need to broaden my horizons. My most recent 2016 knife acquisitions have been a scrimshawed and engraved Randall Bowles Skinner, a mid 70's stag handled drop point hunter made by Bob Loveless, a Spyderco Rubicon, ZT-0801BLK and ZT0450CF. Really enjoying these modern titanium/Carbon Fiber flippers a lot They have become my EDC knives with the Rubicon and 450CF seeing primary use, while the 801 has the best action of the group.
Very impressed with the design, fit and finish of the Rubicon and thought that one of these two Spyderco's would make a nice dress knife. I have several prewar vintage dress knives I am always concerned with losing/damaging. While I wouldn't be happy about it either of these knives would be replaceable.
Let me start by saying I have not seen or held either of these models, as my local knife sources do not have them in stock. My feeling is that these knives have more in common than differences and was hoping to get your input and thoughts.
I love the back lock on these knives. Am I correct in assuming they both use the same mechanical design for their locks? The great images here on BF would indicate that, but I wanted to be sure that one isn't better than the other.
I am a sucker for a Sunburst pattern and the Native 5 reminds me of the sunburst patterned guilloché dials on my favorite Swiss watches. The work and effort involved in the Chaparral is awe inspiring. 12 a day? I am surprised that got ok'd during the design meetings.
The blade shapes seem very similar (identical other than size?). Spyderco's website descriptions don't make that clear and online venders seem to just cut and paste. The jimping on the spine and choil seems similar if not identical and looks to be very effective. While the Native 5 is clearly larger, 15mm OAL difference isn't going to matter to me. The Native 5 being 50% heavier than the Chaparral on the other hand, raises an eyebrow. While I think I would prefer CTS XHP, I am certain that S35VN is way more steel than I will ever need (although I do open some pretty tough envelopes).
I have read/viewed several reviews that discuss the perimeter edges of the Native 5 as being "sharp", which I take to mean 90 degrees and similarly, several reviews indicate the edges of the Chaparral are radiused. For those that own or have handled these knives - is this an issue I should be concerned with? I want a dress knife with a luxurious feeling when handled.
While I would prefer to buy an American made knife, I am very happy with the Rubicon and would be satisfied with either manufacturing facility.
The cost difference is irrelevant to me as they are "close enough" and no, I won't "just buy them both".
Your thoughts on choosing between these to knives? Have I made mistakes or misassumptions in my thought process? Any strong feelings for or against either one?
I find it ironic I am enjoying Spyderco's higher end knives, as I was under the mistaken impression that Spydercos's were imported $35 knives with strange serrated blade shapes and plastic handles.
Great forum here, I have gotten quite an education just lurking around.
Dave
Trying to make the decision on which of these knives will become my "Sunday go to meetin' " (dress) knife.
Some background on me and my taste in knives. I've been knife collecting for 35 years and have several hundred knives primarily focused on pre-WWII knives and military blades. Recently, I have been turn on to more modern knives and steels by a good friend who thought I need to broaden my horizons. My most recent 2016 knife acquisitions have been a scrimshawed and engraved Randall Bowles Skinner, a mid 70's stag handled drop point hunter made by Bob Loveless, a Spyderco Rubicon, ZT-0801BLK and ZT0450CF. Really enjoying these modern titanium/Carbon Fiber flippers a lot They have become my EDC knives with the Rubicon and 450CF seeing primary use, while the 801 has the best action of the group.
Very impressed with the design, fit and finish of the Rubicon and thought that one of these two Spyderco's would make a nice dress knife. I have several prewar vintage dress knives I am always concerned with losing/damaging. While I wouldn't be happy about it either of these knives would be replaceable.
Let me start by saying I have not seen or held either of these models, as my local knife sources do not have them in stock. My feeling is that these knives have more in common than differences and was hoping to get your input and thoughts.
I love the back lock on these knives. Am I correct in assuming they both use the same mechanical design for their locks? The great images here on BF would indicate that, but I wanted to be sure that one isn't better than the other.
I am a sucker for a Sunburst pattern and the Native 5 reminds me of the sunburst patterned guilloché dials on my favorite Swiss watches. The work and effort involved in the Chaparral is awe inspiring. 12 a day? I am surprised that got ok'd during the design meetings.
The blade shapes seem very similar (identical other than size?). Spyderco's website descriptions don't make that clear and online venders seem to just cut and paste. The jimping on the spine and choil seems similar if not identical and looks to be very effective. While the Native 5 is clearly larger, 15mm OAL difference isn't going to matter to me. The Native 5 being 50% heavier than the Chaparral on the other hand, raises an eyebrow. While I think I would prefer CTS XHP, I am certain that S35VN is way more steel than I will ever need (although I do open some pretty tough envelopes).
I have read/viewed several reviews that discuss the perimeter edges of the Native 5 as being "sharp", which I take to mean 90 degrees and similarly, several reviews indicate the edges of the Chaparral are radiused. For those that own or have handled these knives - is this an issue I should be concerned with? I want a dress knife with a luxurious feeling when handled.
While I would prefer to buy an American made knife, I am very happy with the Rubicon and would be satisfied with either manufacturing facility.
The cost difference is irrelevant to me as they are "close enough" and no, I won't "just buy them both".
Your thoughts on choosing between these to knives? Have I made mistakes or misassumptions in my thought process? Any strong feelings for or against either one?
I find it ironic I am enjoying Spyderco's higher end knives, as I was under the mistaken impression that Spydercos's were imported $35 knives with strange serrated blade shapes and plastic handles.
Great forum here, I have gotten quite an education just lurking around.
Dave