I had gotten the chance to spend a week with a Spyderco Karambit recently as part of a passaround, and wanted to put down some of my thoughts.
The knife is one heavy little chunk of steel. I've carried an Endura II before, and was sometimes put off by the weight of it when carrying in thinner weight pants (BDUs), as it would flop around more than a lighter knife.
Furthermore, the knife is a little too thin and slick. If a little beefiness was added to the handle in the form of textured panels, it would be a helpful touch.
The handle dimensions are off, IMO. It's too wide (width as in the measurement perpendicular to the axis of the handle when looking at the side of the knife, hole visible), which is uncomfortable, particularly when combined with the thinness of the scales. I definitely do not have small hands/short fingers, so I'm surprised I've not heard anything about this before. Not that long-term hand comfort is vital in a martial tool, but within the parameters of a folding design, I think the handle width to thickness ratio should approach closer to 1:1, or 2:1, like on most fixed karambits.
The reversible clip, as come on just about all the Spydercos now, is a huge welcome. Since it had come with the clip on the right side (the side with the locking bar), set up for a right handed forward grip draw, I immediately switched it over to the other side. Why? Because karambits are reverse grip tools, primarily. If they don't perform in this manner, then they are mostly paperweights.
Next, I experimented with different modes of carry. It was heavy, heavier than need be, IMO. I've never handled the Emerson Karambits, but I suspect making it in lined G-10, or at least the non-lock side in G-10 or similar would cut down on the weight quite a welcome bit. However, it does ride fine in the pocket, if very high, exposing a lot of the knife. My preference turned out to be IWB, where it was covered by whatever untucked shirt I was wearing and supported by my belt.
Next comes, in my mind, by far the most important part for any knife designed with martial application: the draw (and open, if a folder). Actually drawing the knife from carry position is not difficult. The hole is large enough, and the handle curve intuitive enough (or at least, close enough for me to the fixed blade karambits I own), that draws were soon coming fast and smooth. Which brings us to the second part of the action....
Ok, has anyone actually figured out how to open this knife while in reverse grip? Because I sure can't, no matter what method I try. Inertia openings don't work, as the blade is too light compared to the handle, and held in pretty securely by the detent, using your pinky is horribly unreliable, and an unreasonable option in a martial tool. Perhaps taking a dremel to it, and "waveing" it would have solved the problem, but since this was a passaround knife, this was clearly not an option.
On a good note, the pointed end of the handle always came out on the draw, ready to apply some blunt force, and would be secure enough for a strike or two closed, although not very comfortable.
In forward grip, the knife is of course very easy to open, using the hole, although a little slower to draw, IMO, as it's harder to fumble your pinky into the ring than your index finger. In this grip, I would feel less comfortable using the butt of the handle for strikes, as you may be asking for a broken finger.
The lock engages smoothly, holds the blade in tight when it's closed, and is a little tough to disengage, but I think that's mostly a matter of the knife being broken in.
The ability to open the knife in reverse grip, simply and under stress, or lack thereof, is IMO a huge issue. Perhaps everyone has taken to simply using karambits forward grip, which is fine for utility, but doesn't take advantage of body mechanics as well for martial applications. I'm aware that this is an obstacle inherent to translating a reverse grip fixed design into a folder, but it's still a fundamental issue. Until that's resolved, the Karambit may be pretty, but is certainly not very useful as EDC, at least as far as martial applications.
Joe S.
The knife is one heavy little chunk of steel. I've carried an Endura II before, and was sometimes put off by the weight of it when carrying in thinner weight pants (BDUs), as it would flop around more than a lighter knife.
Furthermore, the knife is a little too thin and slick. If a little beefiness was added to the handle in the form of textured panels, it would be a helpful touch.
The handle dimensions are off, IMO. It's too wide (width as in the measurement perpendicular to the axis of the handle when looking at the side of the knife, hole visible), which is uncomfortable, particularly when combined with the thinness of the scales. I definitely do not have small hands/short fingers, so I'm surprised I've not heard anything about this before. Not that long-term hand comfort is vital in a martial tool, but within the parameters of a folding design, I think the handle width to thickness ratio should approach closer to 1:1, or 2:1, like on most fixed karambits.
The reversible clip, as come on just about all the Spydercos now, is a huge welcome. Since it had come with the clip on the right side (the side with the locking bar), set up for a right handed forward grip draw, I immediately switched it over to the other side. Why? Because karambits are reverse grip tools, primarily. If they don't perform in this manner, then they are mostly paperweights.
Next, I experimented with different modes of carry. It was heavy, heavier than need be, IMO. I've never handled the Emerson Karambits, but I suspect making it in lined G-10, or at least the non-lock side in G-10 or similar would cut down on the weight quite a welcome bit. However, it does ride fine in the pocket, if very high, exposing a lot of the knife. My preference turned out to be IWB, where it was covered by whatever untucked shirt I was wearing and supported by my belt.
Next comes, in my mind, by far the most important part for any knife designed with martial application: the draw (and open, if a folder). Actually drawing the knife from carry position is not difficult. The hole is large enough, and the handle curve intuitive enough (or at least, close enough for me to the fixed blade karambits I own), that draws were soon coming fast and smooth. Which brings us to the second part of the action....
Ok, has anyone actually figured out how to open this knife while in reverse grip? Because I sure can't, no matter what method I try. Inertia openings don't work, as the blade is too light compared to the handle, and held in pretty securely by the detent, using your pinky is horribly unreliable, and an unreasonable option in a martial tool. Perhaps taking a dremel to it, and "waveing" it would have solved the problem, but since this was a passaround knife, this was clearly not an option.
On a good note, the pointed end of the handle always came out on the draw, ready to apply some blunt force, and would be secure enough for a strike or two closed, although not very comfortable.
In forward grip, the knife is of course very easy to open, using the hole, although a little slower to draw, IMO, as it's harder to fumble your pinky into the ring than your index finger. In this grip, I would feel less comfortable using the butt of the handle for strikes, as you may be asking for a broken finger.
The lock engages smoothly, holds the blade in tight when it's closed, and is a little tough to disengage, but I think that's mostly a matter of the knife being broken in.
The ability to open the knife in reverse grip, simply and under stress, or lack thereof, is IMO a huge issue. Perhaps everyone has taken to simply using karambits forward grip, which is fine for utility, but doesn't take advantage of body mechanics as well for martial applications. I'm aware that this is an obstacle inherent to translating a reverse grip fixed design into a folder, but it's still a fundamental issue. Until that's resolved, the Karambit may be pretty, but is certainly not very useful as EDC, at least as far as martial applications.
Joe S.