- Joined
- Jul 22, 2000
- Messages
- 981
In this day of liner-locks, axis/rolling locks, and even Spyderco's own compression lock, you'd think that the lockback would be relegated to cheap, drugstore, knives.
Many knife knuts -- as well as high-end knife manufacturers -- feel it is an economy feature: easy and cheap to manufacture.
Yet Spyderco's lockbacks survive and even thrive. There are people who will dismiss liner-locks, and axis locks in favor of Spyderco's lockbacks.
My question is WHY? What makes Spyderco's lockbacks better, and able to compete with more non-traditional locking mechanisms?
Many knife knuts -- as well as high-end knife manufacturers -- feel it is an economy feature: easy and cheap to manufacture.
Yet Spyderco's lockbacks survive and even thrive. There are people who will dismiss liner-locks, and axis locks in favor of Spyderco's lockbacks.
My question is WHY? What makes Spyderco's lockbacks better, and able to compete with more non-traditional locking mechanisms?