As the title would indicate I think there were a few models of Spyders that were completely misunderstood or just somewhat overlooked: 2 in particular. Two of them that I thought were incredible knives but you just don't hear much fanfare about them are: The C-50 Centofante II and the C-23 Renegade.
I carried both knives EDC for a while and had very good performance from both of them. But I don't think that I had more that 2 other people give them any praise
. I think that both designs were very practical and useful. But I feel like they were completely overlooked and overshadowed by some of the other Spyder classics.
2 questions I have: Do any of you agree with me that these great blades didn't get their deserved recognition? And wouldn't you all also agree that both of these blades would make superb comeback candidates with newer/better blade steel?
I carried both knives EDC for a while and had very good performance from both of them. But I don't think that I had more that 2 other people give them any praise

2 questions I have: Do any of you agree with me that these great blades didn't get their deserved recognition? And wouldn't you all also agree that both of these blades would make superb comeback candidates with newer/better blade steel?