- Joined
- Apr 5, 2003
- Messages
- 807
I was fascinated when this article appeared in Scientific American in 2000, elucidating the nature of traditional wootz/bulat steel, due to the work of the late great maker Al Pendray and the metallurgist John D. Verhoeven (which modern pattern-welded "Damascus" steels had only emulated in appearance, after the original methods were lost):
https://imgur.com/a/3GRkr
At the time, I thought this article would represent the beginning of wootz steel coming back into knifemaking in a big way, but as far as I can tell, that hasn't happened. For all of the great work being done on damascus these days, it's not wootz.
What happened? Why isn't wootz a big deal? Personally I find the subtlety of the appearance of wootz to be stunning and I'd love to see it in more knives. And more important than appearance, does anyone have experiences with making serious use of a wootz/bulat knife, whether modern (post-Pendray) or traditional (pre-20th-Century)?
https://imgur.com/a/3GRkr
At the time, I thought this article would represent the beginning of wootz steel coming back into knifemaking in a big way, but as far as I can tell, that hasn't happened. For all of the great work being done on damascus these days, it's not wootz.
What happened? Why isn't wootz a big deal? Personally I find the subtlety of the appearance of wootz to be stunning and I'd love to see it in more knives. And more important than appearance, does anyone have experiences with making serious use of a wootz/bulat knife, whether modern (post-Pendray) or traditional (pre-20th-Century)?