I have noticed between 1095 and 3V that the 1095 seems like it is a lot easier to get "sharp". Since I know that means different things to different people, my explanation is that the edge #1 will cut paper VERY easily and #2 the edge feels "sticky", as I run my fingers perpendicular to the edge with very light pressure it "grabs" if that makes sense. 3V doesn't seem to get to that point.
In another thread over on Knifemakerforums Jerry Hossom describes his entrance in to the 3V use for blades and noted it would not polish under regular methods. According to the thread, and some subsequent correspondence between Jerry and a chemist, the reasoning as to why is that the vanadium carbide atoms are a lot tougher than the others and don't strip off under normal methods. Thus, the vanadium carbide atoms do not sit flush against the rest. This higher material (I equate the reasoning to grit on sand paper, but much finer) would cause light to scatter = no mirror finish.
Would I be on target in using the same reasoning why the steel won't polish as to why I have not been able to get the 3V steel as, seemingly, sharp as I can 1095?
In another thread over on Knifemakerforums Jerry Hossom describes his entrance in to the 3V use for blades and noted it would not polish under regular methods. According to the thread, and some subsequent correspondence between Jerry and a chemist, the reasoning as to why is that the vanadium carbide atoms are a lot tougher than the others and don't strip off under normal methods. Thus, the vanadium carbide atoms do not sit flush against the rest. This higher material (I equate the reasoning to grit on sand paper, but much finer) would cause light to scatter = no mirror finish.
Would I be on target in using the same reasoning why the steel won't polish as to why I have not been able to get the 3V steel as, seemingly, sharp as I can 1095?