Stress Risers?

chad234

BANNED
Joined
May 14, 2000
Messages
674
I am interested in the effects that holes in blades, notches, spinal serations, etc, have on the strength (particularly lateral strength) and durability of a knife. Any Ideas?
Thanks,
Chad

------------------
"People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf."
George Orwell
"Those who hold the thin blue line keep order, and insure that anarchy and chaos will not prevail." Chad (1992)
"He who lives by the sword dies by the sword. He who dies by the sword did not train hard enough" -Chad (1999)
chad234@email.com
 
Well,

If you know the word "stress riser" I think you know the answer.

But,

It has been observed that failure of a knife often starts in the features you have mentioned. The common fearure seems to be sharp or precipitious corners/edges, deep grooves, that sort of thing, basically a great place for a crack to start. A whole drilled in the middle of the blade is probably not good, but a hole that is not chamferred is definitely worse. Though realistically I think that we are talking about the edge of performance here, if you are taking your knife this far, I have not met you or I question your idea of apropriate use, or you are the Stampinator.

Email Neil Blackwood, he knows this stuff inside out.

Also, on a side note, there was a manufacturer of bicycles that welded their aluminum frames and then heat treated them, that way all the stresses caused by the welding were out.

------------------
Thank you,
Marion David Poff aka Eye, Cd'A ID, USA mdpoff@hotmail.com

>>--->Bill Siegle Custom Knives<---<<
-http://www.geocities.com/siegleknives-

Talonite Resource Page, nearly exhaustive!!

Fire Page, metal match sources and index of information.

"We will either find a way, or make one." Hannibal, 210 B.C.
 
I don't have a properties of materials text in front of my so I can't answer quantitatively, but I can tell you qualitatively what happens. The primary principals of the strength of materials start with beam theory. This calculates how much load you can put on a structural element like a building beam. It is based on a smooth distribution of stresses across the area of any cross-section you would cut through your beam. Basically the bigger the cross-section (actually the bigger the moment of inertia of the cross-section), the stronger the beam is at that point.

Beam theory sort of ignores the size and shape of the cross-section next to the one you're examining. The cross-sections work independently like links in a chain. Under stress the weak link may break, but a funny distribution of link shapes in the neighborhood won't have much effect on your weak link.

Beam theory was found woefully lacking when they started to build iron ships. They discovered that ships would break in half starting at the corners of square hatches in the decks. The ships were strong enough based on beam theory, but broke anyway. This did not happen with wooden ships.

It turns out that hard materials often can't stretch enough to smoothly distribute their stresses under tension. The big problem comes in areas where the cross-section of the material changes suddenly. If you cut a notch in the side of a hardened steel bolt stresses concentrate (rise) at the bottom of the notch. The stress in the bolt under simple tension is not even across the smallest cross-section of the bolt, they may be 10 times higher right at the base of the notch. You might not notice this with a mild steel bolt, but you do with hardened steel. (And that isn't as hard as a knife blade). To really see the problem, see what a notch from a diamond can do to weaken glass.

You can get stress rise at sharp sholders, notches, holes, etc. It is worst at the surface. It is worst when it is a sharp 'V' shape. It is least with smooth curves.

Weirdest of all, you can sometimes reduce stress rising by drilling a small hole through a material a short distance under a notch. That redistributes the stresses and makes them "flow" more smoothly. More importantly it reduces stresses right at the base of the notch.




[This message has been edited by Jeff Clark (edited 11-25-2000).]
 
Jeff- Thank you for your excellent reply.

MDP- I am glad that you replied as it was you review of the WSI/ TOPS Ranger that started my research into the subject.
MDP's review along with a great interview of Chris Janowsky can be seen here: http://www.geocities.com/mdpoff/wsiranger.html
The TOPS Website is here: http://www.topsknives.com/

It appears that a number of knives on the market offer a variety of holes and grooves in the blade (i.e Berreta Airlight, Kershaw/ Onion Boa, and many TOPS products) which would seem to have a negative impact on both blade strength and cutting efficiency.
The benefits that these features claim to offer seem questionable at best.
(although I'm sure both Mike Fuller and Chris Janowsky are far, far more knowledgeable than I in bladecraft and knife design)
Be safe,
Chad
Lover of the K.I.S.S. principle

[This message has been edited by chad234 (edited 11-25-2000).]
 
Back
Top