There are a few issues here: copying designs, utility, and conduct.
COPYING
It's very difficult to say which designs are copies of others. Most ideas are reactions to other ideas, the results of experience with other ideas. The design of user-knives is also constrained by thenotion of utiity. The ICC knife pictures above desn't, to me, seem much like the DB at all. There's an Emerson neck knife which looks exactly like the ICC, only it's black and has no cord wrap. Is that a copy? Even there, I think the design is simple and generic enough (not bad things) that I don't really consider copying a problem. regarding the DB, it's very different in that the lengthwise edge is angled and the finger cut-out is extended to become a unidirectional guard. As for the similarities, let's remember that Mr Strider did not invent neck knives,tanto-tips, finger cut-outs, or cord wrap.
Recently, I bought a Strider MSC/SLCC. I don't consider it a custom because I had nothing to do with it. I saw a picture of it a while ago, and I loved it, and it suited a need of mine prefectly. It was a little expensive for me, and a friend of mine said I'd be stupid to carry a fixed blade after 9/11 (I'm a swarthy male living in NYC and Phila.). So I thought I'd make my own, not wanting to spend that much on something I couldn't use regularly. I figured I could give myself 80% of the function if I made it in O-1 with a BC coating. So first, I made a copy of the SLCC in thick acetate. I wanted to know how the shape handled, and what I would change. As i turned out, not only could I find nothing I wanted to change, but I learned a lot about why the knife was shaped as it was. I loved the design even more. In addition to being a greatknife, it's art, as much as a Mapplethorpe photo printed by the man himself is. So, I bought one. It was really expensive, and I'm unemployed and living off credit cards, but I bought it anyway, because I wouldn't feel right copying something I hadn't paid for from someone to whom I'd given nothing.
Now, the SLCC is a lot like the Perrin Large La Griffe. Go to BladeArt and look. If I liked the La Griffe, but I hated finger holes, and I wanted a blade good for sabbing and getting anice wide wound channel, all in a blade for easy IWB carry, I'd have an SLCC. Do I think Fred Perrin is about to fire off angry email to Mick Strider? No.
There's a line on AT Barr's site along the lines of a mentor telling him that Mr Barr could copy anything in the mentor's shop except the mentor's name. That's cool. It's also realistic.
UTILITY
Whether a person wants cord wrap, flat G-10, or sculpted G-10 is a matter of preference and need. My preferences tend to align with Strider knives. If you're curious as to use, I used to work on cargo ships and film production sets. But, whatever. Regarding blisters: if you're man enough to need anything other than food knives or letter openers, you should have hands tough enough to use whatever, and smart enough to wear gloves if you need to. It's not like Striders have barbed spikes in their handles for really good attachment. So you go with what you like. If you're some kind of candya**ed armchait afficionado, go with what you think looks cool or is meaningful or will be a good investment. I don't understand armchair folks, though.
CONDUCT
Mr Phillips, you have made an awful lot of posts that essentially are attempts to divert people interested in Striders over to him. Your posts often read like the techniques of a Bible salesman. You can search on your own for these posts. As conduct goes, this is ugly. Your knives should be able to stand on their own merits, and frankly, I think they could: they look like fine knives for people with the requisite preferences. But it makes no sense to routinely bash Strider ergonomics when, as you noted, it's a matter of personal preference. And when you uses cord-wrap yourself when you think it's the best choice. As nice as your knives are, they don't suit my personal needs, and I really find your conduct as generall posted to be pretty gross, with the notable exception of you last very gentlemanly post. Sir, I really suggest you find a mode of salesmanship that better befits you.
Mr Strider, I have a lot of respect for your integrity. I've never seen you bash anyone or say anything unreasonable before. Your first post after 9/11, the one guarding against compounding the enemy through racism, and the post after it when you said "be kind," were two of the best things I've ever read. I really dislike name brand crap, but thse two post and the rest of what I know about you, along with your talents, make me happy to have your work at my hip. I know you speak your mind, and that's part of your integrity. However, this copying nonsense is grade-school crap that you threw out here and on the other board. I don't care if you tell folks to f*ck off - my mother's language would make you blush - but this is a case where desgn copying is, at best, not the point.
Thanks for reading. If anyone didn't care to read my personal feelings, why the f*ck did you? Also, I'm a little unhappy scolding people in public from behind a computer; if any of the gentlemen whose names I mentioned would care to email me, I'd be happy to emailyou my phone number. I have only a mobile phone, so as it'd be my dime either way, I'd be happy to call you at an appointed time at a provided number. I much prefer face to face, but you're all quite distant, unless anyone wants to provide airfare. This isn't in any way a provocation for a fight, but I tend to not back away from those, so if you want to kick my a**, send a ticket, and I'll put up a fight while you try. 'm sure everybody here could kick my ass. Whatever.
The above was just for completeness's sake; I don't think this is a big deal, and I don't think anybody else does, either. And excuse the typos; I'm lazy.