stabman
Gold Member
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2007
- Messages
- 21,330
Hello.
I have the Buck/Strider SBTG(model 882) and the thing is built like a tank!
It has me thinking of the Strider SNG, because of the frame-lock(yeah, I know they're liars, but I'm caring about the knife
).
So, the question is, other than lock-up, which should be better on the SNG due to the frame-lock...
How do they compare for all around TOUGHNESS???
I mean, the 882 has .125" thick G-10 scales PLUS the 0.050" thick steel liner, whereas the SNG has just the G-10 on the one side. This seems like it would have a bit less strength for prying(no snide comments; remember, it's a sharpened pry-bar
), and I'd read that at times knives with the one side being just G-10 develop a tad of loosness(don't know for sure though, which is why I'm asking).
ALSO, the blade stop pins rest nicely against the liners on the 882; is the G-10 side of the SNG likely to give a bit of play over time due to the stop pin "eroding" it over time?
So, what's the low-down? Should I stick with the 882, or save up for the SNG?
I have the Buck/Strider SBTG(model 882) and the thing is built like a tank!
It has me thinking of the Strider SNG, because of the frame-lock(yeah, I know they're liars, but I'm caring about the knife
So, the question is, other than lock-up, which should be better on the SNG due to the frame-lock...
How do they compare for all around TOUGHNESS???
I mean, the 882 has .125" thick G-10 scales PLUS the 0.050" thick steel liner, whereas the SNG has just the G-10 on the one side. This seems like it would have a bit less strength for prying(no snide comments; remember, it's a sharpened pry-bar
ALSO, the blade stop pins rest nicely against the liners on the 882; is the G-10 side of the SNG likely to give a bit of play over time due to the stop pin "eroding" it over time?
So, what's the low-down? Should I stick with the 882, or save up for the SNG?