Strider vs. Buck Strider, difference ?

Joined
Apr 25, 2007
Messages
22
Forgive my ignorance & if this has been posed before (didn't find anything in a search) but, what is the difference between the Strider folder & the Buck Strider? Besides the fact that the Strider is over twice the price of the Buck.

Thanks in advance
 
Strider is made by Mick Strider and company. Buck by buck.

Different steels, different process, different quality which means different price.
 
So is the Buck Strider merely a knife styled after the pattern developed by Mick Strider? Overall how does it compare as a knife?
 
Strider uses mostly a framelock and Buck uses a liner lock for the comarative models as strider does also use liner locks bu not on the blades that the Buck was modeled after.
 
Stylistically yes.

Compared to what, the Strider Strider? It's probably about 50% the knife the strider is. :D
 
The 880/881 series of knives that Buck made were not an exact copy of the Strider AR/GB series of knives. The handles on the Bucks were slimmer from top to bottom and a little bit more comfortable in my hand than the AR/GB's. Outside of that there is a big difference in the feel, action, and materials of both. I currently have a Strider AR and a Buck 880SP, and if I had to choose one to depend on everytime, it would be the Strider AR. I've never had a slipping liner, the action has always been smooth, the fit and finish is good with everything lined up as it should be. The Buck is nice, but the spinewhack would unlock it until I worked on it, the blade would not center, and the G-10 was not as evenly fit as I think it should have been. I will say that I like the Buck G-10 texture. In conclusion, there is nothing wrong with the Buck that can't be fixed, even though you might have to compromise a little on overall fit/finish, and it is a good heavy duty knife in use. But as with all things, you do get what you pay for and the Strider AR/GB's are well worth the money in my estimation!:D
 
I own both a Strider SnG, and a Buck Tarani SBT. I will not dignify the latter as a anything more than a Strider copy - the second one. Buck replaced the first for its liner lock, and it's little better - I cannot trust it to stay locked, either.

The 440mod, FRN Tarani with hollow ground blade is exactly what Buck should have never made. Buck's choice of everyday steel is average, at best, the FRN checkering was never necessary, the liner lock the thinnest I own. For the price, a Chinese copy would have offered better steel and lockup - and with the vague production sources going on right now (not everything is made in Idaho,) I question the country of origin.

The SnG, however, is everything the Tarani is not - thinner, lighter, superb lockup that has never failed, tough edge that keeps sharp cutting shrinkwrapped pallets of steel. The pocket clip/framelock cutout has never allowed the knife to work out of my jeans pocket like others have, even on some really threadbare denim. The flat ground blade, double choil, opening hole, bull pivot, and truly tough construction work together to provide the best working knife I have ever owned. The Tarani only amplifies the difference with its shortcomings.

You do pay for what you get - I have owned a Spyderco Military, BM CQC7, and quite a few others, and the SnG is an archetype, landmark piece for its construction, ergonomics, and style. Getting a Buck in ATS34 and G10 would be close - but it still wouldn't be the real thing. The warranty is second to none - the maker himself will work on it - not replace it with another from the next lot just as bad.

This one time, save your money, you will not be disappointed - worst case, you can sell it for nearly what it cost, and can knowledgeably say why it didn't work for you. That's a pretty cheap education in knives lesser brands can't match - I have them sitting in a box, used, valued at less that half what I paid, and the whole lot could have bought many Striders had they been available 20 years ago.
 
I have a Buck strider, I forget the model number but it is a OS green handle, and shaped like a SNG. The knife itself is decent, doesn't hold to well of a edge. The lock on the other hand is the worst liner I have ever used.

I am going to try and mod it into a frame lock, as it is just so bad.
 
just my opinion but I would not buy anything made by buck, it all seems to be junk. And I would say a buck/Strider is 1/4 of a real Strider, if that! really it is just a pos.
 
I have a Buck 880SP and like it a lot. The ATS-34 blade heat treated by Paul Bos takes and holds an excellent edge; it's a big, rugged, reliable folder that could take a lot of abuse. My main objection is that it's too big to comfortably carry in a jeans pocket, so I keep it in the truck box for gnarly tasks that come along, and I don't worry about babying it. Opens with a flick of the wrist, the lock-up is solid and the grip is fine by me. Darn good tool, IMHO.
 
just my opinion but I would not buy anything made by buck, it all seems to be junk. And I would say a buck/Strider is 1/4 of a real Strider, if that! really it is just a pos.

About a gazillion folks would challenge that statement.

I don't have Buck strider. The design does not appeal to me. I do have several other Buck knives and have always found them to be solid performers.

Buck makes their Strider models in two different steels, ATS34 and 420HC. If I were to compare a Buck Strider to SNG, it would be the ATS34 bladed model. That model is ~1/3 the price. The 420HC bladed Buck Strider is about 1/8 the price.
 
just my opinion but I would not buy anything made by buck, it all seems to be junk. And I would say a buck/Strider is 1/4 of a real Strider, if that! really it is just a pos.

My Buck 880T was no piece of Junk. It was solid and very well made, though it did have a slight bit of blade play.
 
Buck Striders are definitely not junk. Smoothest action I've ever seen. Exellent F/F. Of course nor that rugged as original Strider.
 
the buck/strider 880's arent really like any of the striders imho, though they are really good knives i do not like the blocky handle myself, i would say "not much like a strider" irregardless of price, its simply not the same thing at all, apples/oranges.

the other line of bucks (cant remember the mod #) the ones with the brown handles(some of 'em anyway) that look sorta like a SnG look ok but have thin liner locks and seem to have some liner issues, again, not nearly a real strider, not even kinda close.
 
I got a 889 to abuse a couple of months ago and am happy with it.

Locks up like a vault, have not gotten the lock to fail yet... Steel is so-so, but for intended use (Cutting roots, garden work...) it's fine.

I've handled a couple of Striders and own one, and the Buck/Strider knives are not on the same level, but as far as a strudy folder I don't feel bad about beating into the ground... I'm happy with my 889.

I should add I have seen some with weak or failing locks, so I would advise handling one before buying it... Mine actually came out of the box with a rust spot under the blade coating... Which is obviously an issue, but not a deal breaker when it comes to a knife one buys to abuse.
 
EvilGemini, I purchased a Buck Strider after I lost my MT Scarab while on duty. Its inexpensive and a solid knife. So if you lose it, its not like you lost a 300 plus dollar knife.

On a side note, I plan to get a Strider in due time since I like this knifes feel.
 
Back
Top