Strider vs William Henry

Locutus D'Borg

Platinum Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2012
Messages
5,222
Here are the two knives. On top is the B12 Spearpoint "Adventure" with frame and bolsters in hand-forged "T-Rex" Damascus by Delbert Ealy, inlaid with the ring cut of a 10,000-year-old fossilized Woolly Mammoth tusk. The blade is 'Intrepid' Damascus hand-forged by Chad Nichols;

And on bottom is the newest gen Strider PT with blasted Ti scales and blasted CPM 154 blade.

I only use one; guess which (heh, heh)?

IMG_2649.JPG
 
I would use the William Henry all day. It's almost too nice to use, but really it's too nice not to use. Enjoy whichever one you choose. Use it like you stole it.
 
I love the WH, I pick that one.
As I heard someone else on here say, the strider would be better with another choil or two.
Yep the strider is useless!! Without at least one spine choil!! The best models have lanyard choils...thats the only model I would trust!
 
Not really a fair comparison I like cmp154 in general but for the $ on the Strider is about as lame as Medford using d2 these days .
William Henry whether you use it or not is a much better choice
 
The Strider is just another ti frame lock……
It is the first Strider I have owned, and the tolerances, etc. are as good if not better than CRK's and I've owned, and currently own, a few of those. I was surprised at how like a bank vault it is. These days people want knives they can flick open and that the blades will drop close and this does neither. Which is fine with me.
 
The William Henry E10 is probably one of the most underrated (by knife enthusiasts) knives of the last 20 years. Super well made, slices like a laser (a better cutting tool and than 98% of other knives out there), and was around $300 to $325. Sadly it’s not readily available anymore, probably because it was under appreciated.
 
Back
Top