You have to be careful not to confuse apples and oranges here. There are at least  four systems, CAMI (USA), FEPA (Europe usually with F or P prefix), one for Japanese waterstones, and also mesh size. For all, the bigger the number the finer the grit.
Best way IMO, is particle size in microns--microns is microns, not some big number that could be one of the grit systems or mesh size. Be aware that there also seems to be another system that the smaller the number, the finer the particle size, so make sure it's in microns!!
From handy link below:
Chromium oxide polishing compound: 0.5 microns
6000 Japanese waterstone:__________2   microns
Green chrome rouge_________________3   microns
4000 Japanese waterstone___________3   microns
CAMI (USA) 1500 grit wheel_________3   microns
Hard black Arkansas________________9  microns
CAMI (USA) 1000 grit wheel_________9  microns
I present a few entries from the extensive table for  reader's calibration.  Chromium oxide is the finest entry on the table.
http://www.ameritech.net/users/knives/grits.htm
for micron/mesh size conversion:
http://www.gemsociety.org/info/chmesh.htm
Dunno what the oxymoron "green chrome rouge" refers to

 , but the Veritas chromium oxide honing compound I have is finer than my 6000 waterstone, so I think it must be 0.5 micron. I think that maybe the Lee valley catalog says it's 0.5 micron, and I'm pretty sure that I've seen others say that this was the case.
Anyone know if I'm correct in thinking that sandpaper made in the US will use the CAMI grit system?
The finer grit measurements are derived from empirical sedimentation measurements (not sieves)--the correlation to size in microns is not a simple function. The table doesn't provide a CAMI equivalent for 0.5 microns. But at some point very fine particles will take forever to settle out of a liquid to form sediment leading to very large numbers, so the system loses meaning at the extremes anyway. Another reason to like microns.
 
I've read that the various grades of Arkansas stones have the same size abrasive particles, but differ in their 
 spacing . The closer packed, the finer the equivalent grit, and the denser the stone. They are graded by density.
So as usual, things aren't as simple as they could be, some due to nature and some due to people inventing a bunch of different ways to do the same thing.
Unfortunately, Tripoli and Jeweler's rouge are not on the linked table, but I'm thinking again that the Lee Valley site could have more info. But the memory bank could have a glitch, as it often does. 
