- Joined
- May 19, 2009
- Messages
- 1,161
So this is pretty much following up on my previous thread where I was asking some questions that related to this idea of mine. I was wondering whether to post this up or not, but I figured I could use the advice and opinions from you guys should I ever decide to get this special ordered. It's also a constant work in progress for me as I don't see myself having the funds to get a custom-made kukri any time soon. Hopefully by the time that I do, I'll have the design hammered out to what I want it to be...
The idea here is pretty much to make a heavy duty chopper that will still work well for slicing thinner, springer vegetation. I added a scale and I drew it with the idea of it being 18" OAL (but undecided about spine thickness). Here's my thinking: A wide belly (about 3.5" wide at it's widest) is being combined with fairly forward curvature and a rather wide bevel (about 1"). The tip - if you can call it that - is very "stubbed" in order to put more weight ahead of the sweet spot while conserving overall length - this is to (hopefully) create an added sheering effect on impact as this weight will continue wanting to move forward. The fuller is also placed in such a spot as to add to this effect... I know that the rather blunt tip is offputting for most people, but I figure that the kukri is a forward curved blade for a reason, and that is to chop. I've never found myself needing to stab with any of my kukris, so I figure that the trade-off is a good one.
The design:
What I'm thinking the blunter tip will aid with:
.
.
.
Thoughts? Constructive criticism?
The idea here is pretty much to make a heavy duty chopper that will still work well for slicing thinner, springer vegetation. I added a scale and I drew it with the idea of it being 18" OAL (but undecided about spine thickness). Here's my thinking: A wide belly (about 3.5" wide at it's widest) is being combined with fairly forward curvature and a rather wide bevel (about 1"). The tip - if you can call it that - is very "stubbed" in order to put more weight ahead of the sweet spot while conserving overall length - this is to (hopefully) create an added sheering effect on impact as this weight will continue wanting to move forward. The fuller is also placed in such a spot as to add to this effect... I know that the rather blunt tip is offputting for most people, but I figure that the kukri is a forward curved blade for a reason, and that is to chop. I've never found myself needing to stab with any of my kukris, so I figure that the trade-off is a good one.
The design:

What I'm thinking the blunter tip will aid with:

.
.
.
Thoughts? Constructive criticism?

Last edited: