This sweet little blade just came in today; excellent grip ergonomics, very sharp out of the box, obviously a superlative CCW blade. The one thing that puzzled me was the obvious asymmetry insofar as how far the edge extends toward the choil on either side and the resulting geometry of the grind -- one side is flat and the other is quite rounded and concave.
This is a crappy photo, but it shows what I mean to some extent. Mind you, I saw another photo of the Street Beat in a similar orientation showing a similar profile.
Why are they ground like this and not symmetrically?
If I were a Japanese craftsman (and the Street Beat seems to be made in Seki), I might introduce an intentional imperfection into the piece, for aesthetic/philosophical reasons, i.e.:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wabi_sabi
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WabiSabi
But given that this is made for an American client, it seems an unlikely consideration.
I personally like the way it looks just fine, and will take the asymmetry in an otherwise perfectly executed object as a reminder of the imperfection of humans and human endeavors, but I do wonder...
This is a crappy photo, but it shows what I mean to some extent. Mind you, I saw another photo of the Street Beat in a similar orientation showing a similar profile.
Why are they ground like this and not symmetrically?
If I were a Japanese craftsman (and the Street Beat seems to be made in Seki), I might introduce an intentional imperfection into the piece, for aesthetic/philosophical reasons, i.e.:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wabi_sabi
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?WabiSabi
But given that this is made for an American client, it seems an unlikely consideration.
I personally like the way it looks just fine, and will take the asymmetry in an otherwise perfectly executed object as a reminder of the imperfection of humans and human endeavors, but I do wonder...