I guess just thinking about the dimensional nature of it is making me a bit crazy. I can't draw on the computer worth a darn, so I'll try words.
Lets presume - at the edge that the transition from ricasso to what will eventually be working edge takes - oh maybe 3/8 of and inch. (Probably much less) I understand how the upper part of the plunge will sweep over that 3/8 inch. But I'm looking for a plunge that sweeps - I dunno - maybe 2 3/8 inches across the top.
Now picture a cross section of the blade right near the beginning of that area - right after the first 3/8 inches. At this point, the plunge cut is only going maybe half the height of the blade or even less and the angle from the edge to that half heigh mark is pretty steep.
Insert a few more steps here that I won't describe. The idea being that this is a smooth transition and not just the two points I'll be describing.
Now, consider the distal end of that sweeping plunge - toward the point and maybe 2 3/8 inches away from the ricasso. Now, the cross section is a straight line from the edge - all the way to the spine - and not nearly so steep as the first cross section.
The rest of the cross sections from there to the tip will be a similar angle, except for some allowances for drop point or distal taper that would hurt my brain to calculate.
Now imagine this transition from ricasso - to steep angle - gradually to shallow angle and then more or less consistent shallow. Does it help to liken this to a golf green?
How the heck does a guy finish that putt with a flat disc sander???
If anyone can translate my warped thoughts for others, I'd apprecaite the help.
Thanks
Rob!