Jim March
Knifemaker / Craftsman / Service Provider
- Joined
- Oct 7, 1998
- Messages
- 3,022
This thread picks up where this one: http://www.bladeforums.com/ubb/Forum32/HTML/003857.html
left off.
----------------------
Cliff, I need to clarify something: I'm not arguing that a forged Cobalt alloy with the same makeup as Talonite is "bad" in any way. In truth, I have no idea whether or not such forged Cobolt is better or worse than Talonite.
My point for this thread is that we're going to be getting free "Talonite", the "real stuff" by that name. That means it's a Cobolt alloy with a "hot rolled, age hardened" process. And THAT in turn means that the winning knife will be stock-removal, which should affect people's designs. Radically upswept tips and other features that will leave lots of expensive grinder dust around
should be re-thunk.
That wasn't meant as a slur on Steve Schwarzer or you
. On the contrary; if it's possible to forge this stuff and get a good blade that way, I can immediately see there's a cost savings. Sorta like how the Nepalese kamis mostly heat'n'beat 5160 because to them, that's expensive metal...they'd choke if they knew what these Cobolt alloys cost and would consider it near-criminal to grind it into dust
.
Jim
left off.
----------------------
Cliff, I need to clarify something: I'm not arguing that a forged Cobalt alloy with the same makeup as Talonite is "bad" in any way. In truth, I have no idea whether or not such forged Cobolt is better or worse than Talonite.
My point for this thread is that we're going to be getting free "Talonite", the "real stuff" by that name. That means it's a Cobolt alloy with a "hot rolled, age hardened" process. And THAT in turn means that the winning knife will be stock-removal, which should affect people's designs. Radically upswept tips and other features that will leave lots of expensive grinder dust around
That wasn't meant as a slur on Steve Schwarzer or you
Jim