- Joined
- Nov 26, 2001
- Messages
- 1,375
I think that it's just a fahsion, that such blades aren't really useful or better than the traditional ones and surely they are no good especially in their more advertised feature: good blade shape for stabbing.
1) Tanto point is not tanto point. Tantos had a point similar to a normal western knife point. Katanas had a similar point but the shape of the kissaki (the part of point separated by a corner from the blade) was much different.
2) Tanto point is no good for stabbing. A tanto point is much more sturdy than traditional points. A hammer is sturdy too, but I don't think anybody in his right mind would advertise a hammer as great for stabbing.
Tanto point was developed by a culture famous for their CUTTING blades, which for stabbing used blades designed exactly like western ones.
A good stabbing point is that of F/S dagger, or of a XVII century stiletto.
3)Any traditional blade (but the square point shaped ones like the italian "Mozzetto") will outperform the tanto point in stabbing and will perform equally well in cutting.
1) Tanto point is not tanto point. Tantos had a point similar to a normal western knife point. Katanas had a similar point but the shape of the kissaki (the part of point separated by a corner from the blade) was much different.
2) Tanto point is no good for stabbing. A tanto point is much more sturdy than traditional points. A hammer is sturdy too, but I don't think anybody in his right mind would advertise a hammer as great for stabbing.
Tanto point was developed by a culture famous for their CUTTING blades, which for stabbing used blades designed exactly like western ones.
A good stabbing point is that of F/S dagger, or of a XVII century stiletto.
3)Any traditional blade (but the square point shaped ones like the italian "Mozzetto") will outperform the tanto point in stabbing and will perform equally well in cutting.