Taurus 738 TCP (Range review and TONS of pics)

Macchina

Gold Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2006
Messages
5,204
My tax returns were deposited this week so after putting a few grand towards some lingering debt, my wife and I decided to share the remaining $400 for purchases. I choose to get a Ruger LCP with my half, but when I showed up at my FFL he didn't have any LCP's. Instead had a nice stainless slide Taurus TCP for $5 less! I'd looked at this gun when I was trying to pick out a pocket gun and liked everything but the brand. Come to find out, Taurus is now making some of their guns completely in the USA, so I gave them a try. I walked out with the little .380, 2 mags, a nifty belt case, and 2 boxes of Prvi Partizan ammo (the guy at the shop said it was decent stuff made by Winchester in Europe).

I went to the range today to shoot the TCP for the first time. The tempature was around 25 degrees Farenheit with low wind. I shot 50 rounds at the 7 yard range. 1 magazine from a rest, and the rest free hand.

My expectations were of many misfires and misses as many have reported from these new .380 minis when they are new. To my dismay, the first shot resulted in a failure to feed! I was very bummed and as I began to rack the slide, I noticed a large amount of blood running down my thumb :eek:. Turns out when I tried to take my first shot from a rest, I placed my left thumb over my right thumb and it was severely cut by the slide. I obviously normally don't hold a pistol this way, but because it was so small I accidentally placed my thumb in a completely wrong spot. After correcting my grip, it was smooth sailing (except for a failure to feed when I limp wristed, but the shot surprised me and I blame myself).

I am used to shooting SA/DA pistols, so the trigger pull was very long for me, but it was quite smooth and perfectly light (I'd guess 5 lbs.) for my taste. I greatly prefer this trigger to the Ruger LCP or any DA revolver I have shot. With the practice ammo I was using (Prvi Partizan 94 grain FMJ) I was able to hold 3-4" groups which may not sound like much to most of you, but is quite impressive for me using a new super-compact pistol. I thought the gun was shooting 6" low for the first few mags, but 6 shots from a rest showed a nice 2" (with one flyer) group right on center at 7 yards. I know that long trigger is causing me to drop the muzzle, something practice will correct.

Final observations:
I really like this gun and think it personifies what I was looking for in a pocket pistol. I like love the size, and it is not at all painful to shoot. Accuracy (and my ability to shoot the tiny gun) was much better than I had hoped. It did not show any of the trigger slap/pinching that the P3at has. Everything that should be polished inside is, fit and finish are great. One design flaw I found is the slide has a lot of sharp corners on it and does not carry well without a pocket sheath (of which you should have anyway). The Ruger has a much more "melted" slide with no sharp corners anywhere. The sights were actually quite usable and machined accurately to allow center shooting when aiming right on at 7 yards. The grip allows for two fingers, but I felt very secure shooting the gun and wouldn't want it any longer. This gun is meant to be carried a lot and hopefully never used, so size is its number one trait. Reliability was excellent for the first trip to the range, and as long as you keep your fingers clear and your wrist clear, it seems to be an excellent shooter. A plus on the TCP over the LCP is on the last shot the slide locks back. The slide lock is small, and is pretty sticky right now but was a very welcome addition at the range. The slide serrations are very grippy and do their job well. The mag release button is made of steel (not polymer like I believe the prototypes were) and is out of the way while shooting, yet easy to active when you want to. The mags are under spring tension, and fall out with nice speed. The follower in the mags are plastic, but they have a steel insert which activates the slide hold-open. I think this gun is worth every penny of the $295 I paid for it, and it will be replacing my P239 as my carry gun when I find a good SD load and get a few more boxes through it.


My first shot injury:
DSC00225.jpg

Notice the "residue" on the slide serrations (before cleaning):
DSC00231.jpg

DSC00232.jpg

DSC00235.jpg

DSC00239.jpg

DSC00243.jpg

DSC00244.jpg

DSC00248.jpg

DSC00251.jpg
 
DSC00270.jpg

DSC00271.jpg

DSC00272.jpg

DSC00283-1.jpg

DSC00288.jpg

DSC00293-1.jpg

My current carry gun is the (very compact) Sig P239 in .40S&W. The P239 looks huge when shown with the TCP!
DSC00295.jpg

DSC00303.jpg
 
The TCP comes with a Bulldog case, kinda nice but this thing fits so easily into the pocket that I don't think I will be using it.
DSC00305.jpg

DSC00307.jpg

DSC00309.jpg
 
:thumbup: I rewarded myself with the very same gun Jan 28th and haven't had the luxury of taking it to the range yet:mad:! But my Taurus Mellinuim 40 s&w is still the go to at this time also have the 40 in the larger Taurus PT24/7
IMHO for the $$$ and warranty you will be hard pressed to find a better gun on the market for the average Joe;).
PS: I have put several hundred rounds(7-8) through each one of the 40's with ZERO problems.
Glad you gave the review Michealmcgo!:thumbup:
 
Great review. I have a Kel-tec P3AT but it was purchased before the Taurus came out. If you carry in your pocket I highly recommend a pocket holster. You can get them for as little as $10 (Uncle Mike's or Blackhawk). It'll keep junk off of your pistol, keep it oriented in your pocket for an easy draw, and cover the trigger.
 
i have heard that Taurus uses Rugers same machining plans under contract. IF that is correct it should be more or less the "same" gun internally right? as long as QC is good it sounds right to me. - CB
 
i have heard that Taurus uses Rugers same machining plans under contract. IF that is correct it should be more or less the "same" gun internally right? as long as QC is good it sounds right to me. - CB

I don't know where you heard this from, but I highly doubt it. Sounds like the same rumors about the relation between the LCP and P3at (That Keltec was manufacturing the LCP for Ruger) when the LCP came out.

I am an engineer and draw up machining plans all the time. They are the easiest thing to make yourself if you have a part (such as an LCP). Patents are quite easy to get around as well, and seeing as how the LCP is not that original in design it would be even easier.
 
Last edited:
i see. i had heard that at the local gun store when checking out Taurus. i tend to like them fine myself.
 
i see. i had heard that at the local gun store when checking out Taurus. i tend to like them fine myself.

This may be well and true, and I have not read anything official to say it isn't (also haven't read anything official to say it is). I was just wondering where you heard it.
I tend to be very skeptical when people tell me that one company is working with a competitor on designs. Sometimes it makes sense, but most of the time common sense tells me that if they are competitors, they aren't going to be sharing designs so that another company can sell and item very similar to their own. It just doesn't make much business sense.

I also don't know the guy behind the counter at your gun shop, but I know the ones around here talk a lot of B.S. to make a sale. If there is a commission involved the B.S. usually has to be scraped off the glass just so I can see the guns :rolleyes:
 
I also don't know the guy behind the counter at your gun shop, but I know the ones around here talk a lot of B.S. to make a sale. If there is a commission involved the B.S. usually has to be scraped off the glass just so I can see the guns :rolleyes:

Ain't that the truth....and some are not only full of it but downright ignorant. When I bought my Ruger Vaquero the salesman decided he needed to show me (more like show off) how to remove the cylinder and despite my telling him that he was holding it wrong and tilting to the wrong side he wouldn't listen. As soon as he pulled up the pin the cylinder rolled out of the frame and landed with a loud CRACK! on the glass counter where it proceeded to roll right to the edge before he caught it going off. And no, there weren't any scratches (I checked) otherwise I'd have had him order me another.
 
I visited a Dick's Sporting goods a few years back because they were one of the last stores to have a Winchester Model 70 Coyote (I hate myself for selling it). They had one in the .243 that I wanted and I checked it out and said I'd think about it. I came back an hour later and asked to buy it. They guy who had just shown it to me said that they didn't have anymore .243's in stock! I pointed at the gun he had shown me an hour before and he told me that was a .223 and somebody was just looking at it. I asked him if I could see it and he told me "okay, but it's not what you want" as he passed it to me. I checked the barrel where it said .243 and all he had to say was: "Oh, look at that".
 
Back
Top